Bidgood W D, alSafadi Y, Tucker M, Prior F, Hagan G, Mattison J E
Duke University Medical Informatics, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J Digit Imaging. 1998 Feb;11(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03168720.
The decision to use Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), Health Level 7 (HL7), a common object broker such as the Common Object Request Brokering Architecture (CORBA) or ActiveX (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA) or any other protocol for the transfer of DICOM data depends on the requirements of a particular implementation. The selection of protocol is independent of the information model. Our goal as message standards developers is to design a data interchange infrastructure that will faithfully convey the computer-based patient record and make it available to authorized health care providers when and where it is needed for patient care. DICOM accurately and expressively represents the clinically significant properties of images and the semantics of image-related information. The DICOM data model is small and well-defined. The model can be expressed in Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML) or Object Management Group Interface Definition Language or other common syntax-and can be implemented using any reliable communications protocol. Therefore our opinion is that the DICOM semantic data model should serve as the basis for a logically equivalent set of specifications in HL7, CORBA, ActiveX, and SGML for the interchange of biomedical images and image-related information.
决定使用医学数字成像和通信(DICOM)、健康级别7(HL7)、诸如公共对象请求代理体系结构(CORBA)或ActiveX(微软公司,华盛顿州雷德蒙德)之类的通用对象代理或用于传输DICOM数据的任何其他协议,取决于特定实现的要求。协议的选择与信息模型无关。作为消息标准开发者,我们的目标是设计一种数据交换基础设施,它将忠实地传达基于计算机的患者记录,并在患者护理需要时和需要的地方,将其提供给授权的医疗保健提供者。DICOM准确且富有表现力地表示图像的临床重要属性以及与图像相关信息的语义。DICOM数据模型小巧且定义明确。该模型可以用标准通用标记语言(SGML)、对象管理组织接口定义语言或其他通用语法来表示,并且可以使用任何可靠的通信协议来实现。因此,我们认为DICOM语义数据模型应该作为HL7、CORBA、ActiveX和SGML中一组逻辑等效规范的基础,用于生物医学图像和与图像相关信息的交换。