Mylotte J M
Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, USA.
Am J Infect Control. 1998 Feb;26(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(98)70056-2.
Clostridium difficile is the most common infectious cause of endemic nosocomial diarrhea, but traditional surveillance methods for this infection can be time-consuming. The purpose of this article is to (1) describe a laboratory surveillance method for nosocomial diarrhea and nosocomial Clostridium difficile diarrhea (CDD) that does not require chart review and (2) describe some of the epidemiology of these infections at a university-affiliated, public hospital by using this surveillance method.
The main assumption underlying the surveillance method is that all patients with nosocomial diarrhea have a C. difficile stool toxin assay performed. On the basis of this assumption, the frequency of testing stool samples for toxin is considered a surrogate for the occurrence of nosocomial diarrhea; it is also assumed that the results of the stool toxin assay distinguish between those with (positive assay) and without (negative assay) CDD. During the study period (January 1, 1993, to August 30, 1996) surveillance for nosocomial CDD was performed by monitoring results of C. difficile stool toxin assays done with the Cytoclone A and B enzyme immunoassay. Each month a list of results of all assays performed was reviewed and patients were excluded on the basis of the following criteria. First, patients with assays done within the first 4 days of admission were assumed to have community-acquired diarrhea and excluded. Among patients with assays done > 4 days after admission, patients with two or more assays done within a 7-day period were counted only once; repeated assays (positive or negative) in the 14 days after an initial positive assay (indicating nosocomial CDD) were excluded, but assays done more than 14 days after a positive or a negative assay were counted separately (representing a relapse or new episode of diarrhea). Patients remaining on the list after all the exclusion criteria were applied represented those with nosocomial diarrhea.
The mean (+/- SD) frequency of episodes of nosocomial diarrhea per month for each study year (1993, 1994, 1995, and first 8 months of 1996) was 52.6 +/- 16.2, 51.4 +/- 10.5, 49.2 +/- 9.3, 57.8 +/- 11.6, respectively (p = 0.48 by ANOVA); the mean frequency of nosocomial diarrhea per 1000 admissions per month was 48.4 +/- 14.5, 47.7 +/- 10.9, 44.0 +/- 9.6, and 51.6 +/- 9.3, respectively (p = 0.52); and the mean frequency of nosocomial CDD episodes per 100 episodes of nosocomial diarrhea was 24.7 +/- 8.5, 18.9 +/- 4.8, 17.4 +/- 5.7, and 12.2 +/- 7.2, respectively (p = 0.003). The median time (days) after admission to the onset of nosocomial CDD (first positive assay) for each study year was 14.5, 13.0, 12.0, and 13.0, respectively.
Although not all of the underlying assumptions of the method have been verified, the similarity of the findings in the present study to those of previously published studies of nosocomial CDD suggests that the method is valid. Alternatives to traditional methods of performing nosocomial infection surveillance need to be developed so that infection control practitioners can focus more of their efforts on prevention activities.
艰难梭菌是医院内地方性腹泻最常见的感染病因,但针对这种感染的传统监测方法可能耗时较长。本文旨在:(1)描述一种无需查阅病历的医院内腹泻及医院内艰难梭菌腹泻(CDD)的实验室监测方法;(2)运用该监测方法描述一所大学附属公立医院中这些感染的部分流行病学特征。
该监测方法的主要假设是,对所有医院内腹泻患者均进行艰难梭菌粪便毒素检测。基于这一假设,检测粪便样本中毒素的频率被视为医院内腹泻发生情况的替代指标;还假设粪便毒素检测结果能够区分出患有CDD(检测结果为阳性)和未患有CDD(检测结果为阴性)的患者。在研究期间(1993年1月1日至1996年8月30日),通过监测使用细胞克隆A和B酶免疫分析法进行的艰难梭菌粪便毒素检测结果,对医院内CDD进行监测。每月对所有检测结果列表进行审查,并根据以下标准排除患者。首先,入院后前4天内进行检测的患者被假定患有社区获得性腹泻并予以排除。在入院4天后进行检测的患者中,7天内进行两次或更多次检测的患者仅计为一次;在首次检测结果呈阳性(表明医院内CDD)后的14天内进行的重复检测(阳性或阴性)予以排除,但在阳性或阴性检测14天之后进行的检测分别计数(代表腹泻复发或新发作)。应用所有排除标准后仍在列表中的患者代表医院内腹泻患者。
各研究年份(1993年、1994年、1995年及1996年的前8个月)每月医院内腹泻发作的平均(±标准差)频率分别为52.6±16.2、51.4±10.5、49.2±9.3、57.8±11.6(方差分析p = 0.48);每月每千例入院患者中医院内腹泻的平均频率分别为48.4±14.5、47.7±10.9、44.0±9.6和51.6±9.3(p = 0.52);每百例医院内腹泻中医院内CDD发作的平均频率分别为24.7±8.5、18.9±4.8、17.4±5.7和12.2±7.2(p = 0.003)。各研究年份入院至医院内CDD发作(首次检测结果呈阳性)的中位时间(天)分别为14.5、13.0、12.0和13.0。
尽管该方法的所有潜在假设尚未得到验证,但本研究结果与先前发表的医院内CDD研究结果相似,表明该方法是有效的。需要开发传统医院感染监测方法的替代方法,以便感染控制从业人员能够将更多精力集中在预防活动上。