Shulman A, Jagoda J, Laycock G, Kelly H
Melbourne University.
Aust Fam Physician. 1998 Jan;27 Suppl 1:S19-24.
To determine if the calcium channel blocking agents (CCBs), nifedipine and verapamil are safe and effective therapeutic adjuncts in the management of withdrawal and craving in patients with chronic dependence on opiates, ethanol, amphetamine, benzodiazepines and marijuana.
Oral rapid acting nifedipine or verapamil was administered for 2 weeks (together with oral methadone in decreasing daily doses and specific symptomatic treatment, if appropriate), to patients with chronic dependence on various drugs of addiction. Several objective and subjective parameters were quantified to provide information about the patient's basic condition and progressive response to treatment, both before and after each CCB treatment. Patients also completed a daily questionnaire concerning their withdrawal intensity and provided a daily urine analysis.
Both nifedipine and verapamil appeared to be safe and effective therapeutic adjuncts in the management of withdrawal and craving in 24 patients who successfully completed the trial. Although comparable in therapeutic efficacy in the doses used, verapamil produced far fewer and milder side effects than nifedipine. None of the verapamil side effects resulted in suspension or termination of treatment and it was the preferred agent, especially in patients presenting with a low blood pressure.
In this pilot study nifedipine and verapamil appeared to be effective for the in-patient management of withdrawal and craving in a broad spectrum of chronic drug addicts. Verapamil produced fewer disturbing side effects compared with nifedipine and it may prove a safe, non-addicting and rational treatment in the long term management of chronic dependence, withdrawal and craving. As such, it may be especially valuable in offering the motivated chronic addict help and hope for the long term management of this problem in a community setting. The present results warrant the establishment of a verapamil based, double-blind, drug-matched or placebo-controlled clinical trial to test the validity and significance of these preliminary findings.
确定钙通道阻滞剂硝苯地平和维拉帕米在治疗慢性阿片类、乙醇、苯丙胺、苯二氮䓬类及大麻依赖患者的戒断反应和渴求方面是否为安全有效的辅助治疗药物。
对各类药物成瘾的慢性依赖患者口服速效硝苯地平或维拉帕米2周(酌情联合每日递减剂量的口服美沙酮及特定的对症治疗)。在每次钙通道阻滞剂治疗前后,对多项客观和主观参数进行量化,以了解患者的基本状况及对治疗的进展性反应。患者还需每日填写关于戒断强度的问卷,并提供每日尿液分析结果。
硝苯地平和维拉帕米在24例成功完成试验的患者中,似乎都是治疗戒断反应和渴求的安全有效辅助药物。尽管在所使用的剂量下治疗效果相当,但维拉帕米产生的副作用比硝苯地平少得多且程度较轻。维拉帕米的副作用均未导致治疗中断或终止,它是首选药物,尤其是对血压较低的患者。
在这项初步研究中,硝苯地平和维拉帕米在各类慢性吸毒成瘾者的住院治疗中,似乎对戒断反应和渴求有效。与硝苯地平相比,维拉帕米产生的不良副作用较少,在慢性依赖、戒断和渴求的长期管理中,它可能是一种安全、无成瘾性且合理的治疗方法。因此,在社区环境中为有积极性的慢性成瘾者提供帮助以及对该问题进行长期管理方面,它可能特别有价值。目前的结果值得开展一项以维拉帕米为基础的双盲、药物匹配或安慰剂对照的临床试验,以检验这些初步发现的有效性和重要性。