Suppr超能文献

Differences between cochlear blood flow and endolymphatic sac blood flow in guinea-pigs.

作者信息

Yazawa Y, Suzuki M, Kitano H, Kitajima K

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu City, Japan.

出版信息

Acta Otolaryngol. 1998 Jan;118(1):80-5. doi: 10.1080/00016489850155170.

Abstract

Cochlear blood flow (CoBF) and endolymphatic sac (ES) blood flow (ESBF) were measured in different groups of guinea-pigs by laser-Doppler flowmetry after the intravenous administration of various drugs through the jugular vein for 60 sec. These drugs included 50% glycerol, 70% isosorbide, 20% mannitol, 7% sodium bicarbonate and 1% diphenidol. For CoBF measurements, a probe was positioned on the basal turn of the right cochlea via a ventral approach. For ESBF measurements, it was placed on the right ES through the posterior cranial fossa via a dorsal approach. The average initial measured value of ESBF (8.31 +/- 2.97 ml/min/100 g) was significantly greater (p < 0.0001) than that of CoBF (4.33 +/- 1.15 ml/min/100 g). Following administration of most drugs except for diphenidol, both CoBF and ESBF increased immediately after administration; however, following diphenidol administration both CoBF and ESBF decreased. The magnitude of the CoBF response tended to be greater than that of the ESBF response (p = 0.006-0.112). It seems likely that this reflects anatomical differences in the vascular supplies, i.e. CoBF from the vertebrobasilar artery and ESBF from the external carotid artery. In addition, the presence of micropores or fenestrations in the ES vasculature may contribute to the differences between CoBF and ESBF.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验