Suppr超能文献

依那普利/缓释地尔硫䓬固定复方制剂及其单药疗法治疗1至3期原发性高血压的比较。

Comparison of the fixed combination of enalapril/diltiazem ER and their monotherapies in stage 1 to 3 essential hypertension.

作者信息

Cushman W C, Cohen J D, Jones R P, Marbury T C, Rhoades R B, Smith L K

机构信息

University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Memphis 38104-2193, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 1998 Jan;11(1 Pt 1):23-30. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00372-5.

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of two fixed dose combinations of enalapril and diltiazem extended release formation (ER) (E/D) were compared with their monotherapies and placebo in patients with stage 1 to 3 hypertension. The trial design was a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group, 12 week treatment phase, followed by a 36 week, open label phase. A total of 891 patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP) between 95 and 115 mm Hg were randomly assigned to enalapril 5 mg, diltiazem ER 120 mg, diltiazem ER 180 mg, enalapril 5 mg/diltiazem ER 120 mg (E5/D120), enalapril 5 mg/ diltiazem ER 180 mg (E5/D180), or placebo. In the open label phase, 562 patients received the fixed combination, titrated as needed to control SiDBP < 90 mm Hg. Efficacy was determined with trough (24 +/- 2 h postdose) sitting blood pressure measurements at week 12 and at the end of the open label part of the study. Safety was evaluated based on patient symptoms, clinical laboratories, and electrocardiograms (ECG). E5/D120 and E5/D180 significantly reduced trough SiDBP (-7.6 and -8.3 mm Hg, respectively; P < .05) versus their monotherapies. E5/D120 and E5/D180 significantly reduced trough sitting systolic blood pressure (-7.9 and -9.0, respectively; P < .05) versus both diltiazem ER monotherapies. All active treatments significantly decreased SiDBP and SiSBP versus placebo. E/D effectively lowered SiDBP and SiSBP during the open label extension. No significant difference was seen among treatment groups for the overall incidence of adverse events. The most common drug related adverse events were headache, edema/swelling, dizziness, asthenia/fatigue, cough, rash, and impotence. The event frequency for the combinations were similar to those seen with the monotherapies. Fixed combinations of E/D were generally well tolerated, with an increased blood pressure lowering effect as compared with the individual components in patients with stage I to III hypertension.

摘要

在1至3期高血压患者中,比较了依那普利与缓释地尔硫䓬(ER)两种固定剂量组合(E/D)与其单一疗法及安慰剂的安全性和有效性。试验设计为多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、12周治疗期,随后是36周的开放标签期。共有891名坐位舒张压(SiDBP)在95至115 mmHg之间的患者被随机分配至依那普利5 mg、地尔硫䓬ER 120 mg、地尔硫䓬ER 180 mg、依那普利5 mg/地尔硫䓬ER 120 mg(E5/D120)、依那普利5 mg/地尔硫䓬ER 180 mg(E5/D180)或安慰剂组。在开放标签期,562名患者接受固定组合治疗,根据需要滴定以控制SiDBP<90 mmHg。在第12周以及研究开放标签部分结束时,通过谷值(给药后24±2小时)坐位血压测量来确定疗效。根据患者症状、临床实验室检查和心电图(ECG)评估安全性。与单一疗法相比,E5/D120和E5/D180显著降低了谷值SiDBP(分别为-7.6和-8.3 mmHg;P<.05)。与两种地尔硫䓬ER单一疗法相比,E5/D120和E5/D180显著降低了谷值坐位收缩压(分别为-7.9和-9.0;P<.05)。与安慰剂相比,所有活性治疗均显著降低了SiDBP和SiSBP。在开放标签延长期,E/D有效降低了SiDBP和SiSBP。各治疗组不良事件的总体发生率无显著差异。最常见的药物相关不良事件为头痛、水肿/肿胀、头晕、乏力/疲劳、咳嗽、皮疹和阳痿。组合用药的事件发生率与单一疗法相似。E/D固定组合一般耐受性良好,与I至III期高血压患者的单一成分相比,其降压效果增强。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验