Allred D C, Harvey J M, Berardo M, Clark G M
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284, USA.
Mod Pathol. 1998 Feb;11(2):155-68.
Most recent decisions for breast cancer patients are made on the basis of prognostic and predictive factors. In addition to the traditional tumor/nodal/metastasis staging variables, estrogen and progesterone receptor status as assessed by biochemical ligand-binding assays are the only other factors that have been adequately validated and recommended for routine clinical use. Pathologists today, however, are evaluating estrogen and progesterone receptors almost exclusively by immunohistochemical means. Although many studies suggest that these tests might have equivalent or even superior abilities to predict patient outcome, there are important methodologic shortcomings to resolve before this technology achieves the clinical and technical validation necessary to justify its routine use. Many laboratories are also evaluating other factors for clinical use by immunohistochemical techniques, including, in particular, c-erbB-2, p53, and Ki-67 proliferation indices. Although available studies suggest that these factors might indeed be helpful in making treatment decisions, their clinical usefulness is still controversial, and, like the assessment of hormone receptors, there are important unresolved technical issues, such as how to prepare the tissue, which reagents to use and, most importantly, how to interpret the results. A few laboratories have gone to considerable effort to develop reproducible methods for evaluating these factors, and they have performed comprehensive studies demonstrating the prognostic and predictive significance of their results. Nonetheless, most laboratories offering these tests have not adequately validated them and might not even be aware of the issues needing attention. Unless laboratories validate their tests or follow the procedures of others who have, they run the risk of reporting meaningless and potentially harmful results. In the future, these and other factors will be incorporated into a prognostic index that will better reflect the biologic diversity of breast cancer and that will more accurately predict clinical outcome.
目前,大多数针对乳腺癌患者的治疗决策是基于预后和预测因素做出的。除了传统的肿瘤/淋巴结/转移分期变量外,通过生化配体结合分析评估的雌激素和孕激素受体状态是唯一经过充分验证并被推荐用于常规临床的其他因素。然而,如今病理学家几乎完全通过免疫组化方法来评估雌激素和孕激素受体。尽管许多研究表明,这些检测在预测患者预后方面可能具有同等甚至更优的能力,但在该技术获得常规应用所需的临床和技术验证之前,仍有一些重要的方法学缺陷需要解决。许多实验室也在通过免疫组化技术评估其他临床应用因素,特别是c-erbB-2、p53和Ki-67增殖指数。尽管现有研究表明这些因素可能确实有助于做出治疗决策,但其临床实用性仍存在争议,而且与激素受体评估一样,存在一些重要的未解决技术问题,如如何制备组织、使用何种试剂,以及最重要的是如何解读结果。一些实验室已付出相当大的努力来开发评估这些因素的可重复方法,并进行了全面研究以证明其结果的预后和预测意义。尽管如此,大多数提供这些检测的实验室并未对其进行充分验证,甚至可能并未意识到需要关注的问题。除非实验室对其检测进行验证或遵循其他已验证者的程序,否则他们冒着报告无意义且可能有害结果的风险。未来,这些及其他因素将被纳入一个预后指数,该指数将更好地反映乳腺癌的生物学多样性,并能更准确地预测临床结果。