• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于101名患有噪声性听力损失男性的临床样本,对瑞典语版听力残疾与障碍量表进行评估。

Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Hearing Disabilities and Handicaps Scale, based on a clinical sample of 101 men with noise-induced hearing loss.

作者信息

Hallberg L R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand Audiol. 1998;27(1):21-9. doi: 10.1080/010503998419669.

DOI:10.1080/010503998419669
PMID:9505288
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate, in terms of descriptive statistics, factor analysis, corrected item-total correlations, and internal consistency reliability, a Swedish translation of the Hearing Disabilities and Handicaps Scale (HDHS). The HDHS is shortened and modified version of the Hearing Measurement Scale. Data from 101 men having noise-induced hearing loss, with the pure-tone audiometric data showing a median value of 53.3 dBHL (R = 81.6; Q = 12.5) over the frequencies 3, 4, and 6 kHz better ear, were assessed at the Department of Audiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg. A principal component analysis followed by a varimax rotation was conducted giving four emerging factors, accounting for 64.6% of the variance. Two of the factors, "speech perception" (alpha = 0.89) and "non-speech sounds" (alpha = 0.85), appear to measure perceived disability, whereas two factors, "interpersonal distress" (alpha = 0.79) and "threat to self-image" (alpha = 0.84), appear to measure dimensions related to the process of creating a handicap. The four-factor HDHS needs to be further tested in order to find out its usefulness for clinical assessment of perceived disability and handicap.

摘要

本研究旨在从描述性统计、因子分析、校正后的项目-总分相关性以及内部一致性信度等方面,对听力障碍与残疾量表(HDHS)的瑞典语译本进行评估。HDHS是听力测量量表的简化和修订版。来自101名患有噪声性听力损失男性的数据,其纯音听力计数据显示在较好耳的3、4和6千赫兹频率上的中位数为53.3分贝听力级(R = 81.6;Q = 12.5),这些数据在哥德堡萨尔格伦斯卡大学医院听力科进行了评估。进行了主成分分析,随后进行方差最大化旋转,得出四个新出现的因子,占方差的64.6%。其中两个因子,“言语感知”(α = 0.89)和“非言语声音”(α = 0.85),似乎测量的是感知到的残疾,而另外两个因子,“人际困扰”(α = 0.79)和“对自我形象的威胁”(α = 0.84),似乎测量的是与残疾形成过程相关的维度。四因子HDHS需要进一步测试,以确定其在临床评估感知到的残疾和障碍方面的有用性。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Hearing Disabilities and Handicaps Scale, based on a clinical sample of 101 men with noise-induced hearing loss.基于101名患有噪声性听力损失男性的临床样本,对瑞典语版听力残疾与障碍量表进行评估。
Scand Audiol. 1998;27(1):21-9. doi: 10.1080/010503998419669.
2
Is there a gender difference in coping, perceived disability and handicap in patients with noise-induced hearing loss?噪声性听力损失患者在应对方式、感知到的残疾和障碍方面是否存在性别差异?
Noise Health. 1999;1(2):66-72.
3
A clinical evaluation of the hearing disability and handicap scale in men with noise induced hearing loss.
Noise Health. 2000;2(6):67-78.
4
Speech perception in medico-legal assessment of hearing disabilities.
Int J Audiol. 2016 Oct;55(10):547-55. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1198967. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
5
Validation of a French-Language Version of the Spatial Hearing Questionnaire, Cluster Analysis and Comparison with the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale.法语版空间听力问卷的验证、聚类分析及与言语、空间和听力质量量表的比较
Ear Hear. 2016 Jul-Aug;37(4):412-23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000269.
6
Self-reported disability and handicap in the population in relation to pure-tone threshold, age, sex and type of hearing loss.人群中自我报告的残疾和障碍与纯音听阈、年龄、性别及听力损失类型的关系。
Br J Audiol. 1987 Feb;21(1):45-58. doi: 10.3109/03005368709077774.
7
The self-reported handicapping effect of hearing disabilities.听力障碍的自我报告的阻碍效应。
Audiology. 1998 Sep-Oct;37(5):302-12. doi: 10.3109/00206099809072984.
8
Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.网络噪声环境下的言语测听:第 1 部分:噪声性听力损失识别测试评估。
Int J Audiol. 2011 Nov;50(11):823-34. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.595016.
9
Comparison of the revised Hearing Performance Inventory with audiometric measures.修订后的听力表现量表与听力测定指标的比较。
Ear Hear. 1985 Mar-Apr;6(2):93-7. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198503000-00006.
10
[Determination of hearing loss and disability assessment from pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in occupational noise-induced hearing loss].[职业性噪声性听力损失中纯音听力计和言语听力计测定听力损失及残疾评估]
Laryngorhinootologie. 1996 Dec;75(12):732-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997667.

引用本文的文献

1
Noise-induced hearing loss and hearing aids requirement.噪声性听力损失与助听器需求
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008 Aug;28(4):200-5.