Suppr超能文献

在预处理的低级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤中,感染减少,但与标准剂量的克拉屈滨相比,低剂量克拉屈滨仍保持抗肿瘤活性。

Fewer infections, but maintained antitumor activity with lower-dose versus standard-dose cladribine in pretreated low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

作者信息

Betticher D C, von Rohr A, Ratschiller D, Schmitz S F, Egger T, Sonderegger T, Herrmann R, Kroner T, Zulian G B, Cavalli F, Fey M F, Cerny T

机构信息

Institute of Medical Oncology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1998 Mar;16(3):850-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.3.850.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To study the efficacy and the safety of cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine [2-CDA]) administered at two different dosages.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this two-cohort study, patients with low-grade refractory/relapsing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) received 2-CDA at a dose of 0.7 mg/kg per cycle as a continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion (group 1, n = 44) or at a reduced dose of 0.5 mg/kg per cycle as a subcutaneous (s.c.) bolus injection (group 2, n = 60). Three 2-CDA cycles at > or = 4-week intervals were planned, then treatment could be pursued until six cycles.

RESULTS

A total of 300 cycles were administered (group 1, 114 cycles; group 2, 186). Patient characteristics in both groups were comparable. The median dose-intensities were 0.17 mg/kg/wk and 0.13 mg/kg/wk for groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < or = .0001). The overall response rate for all 104 patients was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45% to 66%; 15% complete response [CR] and 39% partial response [PR]). Response was similar in both patient groups (57% in group 1 and 53% in group 2; P = .72), and no association between 2-CDA dose-intensity and response rate was found (P = .35). Median remission duration was 7 and 12 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .21). Toxicity, in particular opportunistic infections (> or = grade 2, 30% in group 1 v 7% in group 2; P = .003) and myelosuppression (> or = grade 3 neutropenia, 33% v 8% of 2-CDA cycles, P < .0001), were more frequent in group 1. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the infection risk (grade > or = 2) was decreased by 81% with 2-CDA dose reduction in group 2 after adjusting for number of pretreatment regimens and time since diagnosis (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

When administered as a s.c. bolus injection, 2-CDA at 0.5 mg/kg per cycle is safe and this dose level should not be exceeded in this patient population.

摘要

目的

研究两种不同剂量的克拉屈滨(2-氯脱氧腺苷[2-CDA])的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

在这项双队列研究中,低度难治性/复发性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者接受2-CDA治疗,第1组(n = 44)以0.7 mg/kg/周期的剂量持续静脉输注,第2组(n = 60)以0.5 mg/kg/周期的降低剂量皮下推注。计划每4周或更长时间进行3个2-CDA周期,然后可继续治疗直至6个周期。

结果

共进行了300个周期的治疗(第1组114个周期;第2组186个周期)。两组患者的特征具有可比性。第1组和第2组的中位剂量强度分别为0.17 mg/kg/周和0.13 mg/kg/周(P≤0.0001)。104例患者的总体缓解率为54%(95%置信区间[CI],45%至66%;15%完全缓解[CR],39%部分缓解[PR])。两组患者的缓解情况相似(第1组为57%,第2组为53%;P = 0.72),未发现2-CDA剂量强度与缓解率之间存在关联(P = 0.35)。第1组和第2组的中位缓解持续时间分别为7个月和12个月(P = 0.21)。第1组的毒性反应,尤其是机会性感染(≥2级,第1组为30%,第2组为7%;P = 0.003)和骨髓抑制(≥3级中性粒细胞减少,2-CDA周期的比例分别为33%和8%,P<0.0001)更为常见。多因素logistic回归分析显示,在调整预处理方案数量和诊断后的时间后,第2组2-CDA剂量降低使感染风险(≥2级)降低了81%(P = 0.01)。

结论

当以皮下推注方式给药时,2-CDA以0.5 mg/kg/周期的剂量是安全的,在该患者群体中不应超过此剂量水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验