• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以决策支持系统为例的临床软件定量评估。

Quantitative evaluation of clinical software, exemplified by decision support systems.

作者信息

Wyatt J

机构信息

ICRF Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute for Health Sciences, Headington, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Int J Med Inform. 1997 Dec;47(3):165-73. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(97)00100-7.

DOI:10.1016/s1386-5056(97)00100-7
PMID:9513005
Abstract

To ensure the correctness of publicity material ('truth in labelling') and to inform their licensing decisions, agencies certifying or regulating any clinical computer system will need information about the system's structure, performance and likely impact on users and the environment in which they work. This information must be reliable and complete, so it needs to be collected in a structured, rigorous evaluation programme. Clinical decision support systems are generally more complex and their effects less easy to predict than most other clinical software, so pose the greatest challenge to evaluators. They are therefore the focus of this paper.

摘要

为确保宣传材料的正确性(“标签内容属实”)并为其许可决策提供依据,对任何临床计算机系统进行认证或监管的机构将需要有关该系统的结构、性能以及对用户及其工作环境可能产生的影响的信息。此信息必须可靠且完整,因此需要通过结构化、严格的评估程序来收集。临床决策支持系统通常比大多数其他临床软件更为复杂,其效果也更难预测,因此对评估人员构成了最大的挑战。所以,它们是本文的重点。

相似文献

1
Quantitative evaluation of clinical software, exemplified by decision support systems.以决策支持系统为例的临床软件定量评估。
Int J Med Inform. 1997 Dec;47(3):165-73. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(97)00100-7.
2
Desiderata for product labeling of medical expert systems.医学专家系统产品标签的必备条件。
Int J Med Inform. 1997 Dec;47(3):153-63. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(97)00099-3.
3
Diagnostic decision support systems: how to determine the gold standard?诊断决策支持系统:如何确定金标准?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):608-10. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1416.
4
Study of the effects of Clinical Decision Support System's incorrect advice and clinical case difficulty on users' decision making accuracy.临床决策支持系统的错误建议及临床病例难度对用户决策准确性影响的研究
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;164:13-6.
5
Evaluation of clinical information systems. What can be evaluated and what cannot?临床信息系统的评估。哪些可以评估,哪些不可以评估?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2001 Nov;7(4):373-85. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00291.x.
6
Specification of Extended Reflexive Ontologies in the context of CDSS.临床决策支持系统(CDSS)背景下扩展自反本体的规范
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;207:234-43.
7
Ethical and legal issues in the use of clinical decision support systems.临床决策支持系统使用中的伦理和法律问题。
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2002 Fall;16(4):34-7.
8
Using value of information to guide evaluation of decision supports for differential diagnosis: is it time for a new look?利用信息价值来指导对鉴别诊断决策支持的评估:是时候重新审视了吗?
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Sep 11;13:105. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-105.
9
Service-oriented architecture in medical software: promises and perils.医疗软件中的面向服务架构:前景与风险
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):244-6. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2349.
10
Multiattribute selection of acute stroke imaging software platform for Extending the Time for Thrombolysis in Emergency Neurological Deficits (EXTEND) clinical trial.用于延长急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓时间(EXTEND)临床试验的急性脑卒中影像软件平台的多属性选择。
Int J Stroke. 2013 Apr;8(3):204-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00787.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The first steps in the evaluation of a "black-box" decision support tool: a protocol and feasibility study for the evaluation of Watson for Oncology.“黑箱”决策支持工具评估的初步步骤:评估肿瘤学领域的沃森(Watson)的方案与可行性研究
J Clin Transl Res. 2018 Jul 27;3(Suppl 3):411-423. eCollection 2018 Dec 17.
2
Computer-Based Driving in Dementia Decision Tool With Mail Support: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.基于计算机的痴呆症驾驶决策工具及邮件支持:整群随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 25;20(5):e194. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9126.
3
Clinical decision support software for diabetic foot risk stratification: development and formative evaluation.
用于糖尿病足风险分层的临床决策支持软件:开发与形成性评估
J Foot Ankle Res. 2015 Dec 12;8:73. doi: 10.1186/s13047-015-0128-z. eCollection 2015.
4
Assessment of the potential impact of a reminder system on the reduction of diagnostic errors: a quasi-experimental study.评估提醒系统对减少诊断错误的潜在影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Apr 28;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-6-22.
5
Verifying quality and safety in health informatics services.验证健康信息学服务中的质量与安全。
BMJ. 2001 Sep 8;323(7312):552-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7312.552.