Lindros K O, Oinonen T, Kettunen E, Sippel H, Muro-Lupori C, Koivusalo M
National Public Health Institute, Alcohol Research Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Biochem Pharmacol. 1998 Feb 15;55(4):413-21. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00495-4.
The tumor-associated aldehyde dehydrogenase 3 (ALDH3) and the glutathione transferase (GST)Ya form are coded by members of the Ah (aryl hydrocarbon) battery group of genes activated in the liver by polycyclic hydrocarbons such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). The physiological role of the Ah receptor (AHR), its gene-activating mechanism and its endogenous ligands are still poorly clarified. We had previously observed that 3-methylcholanthrene (3MC) and beta-naphthoflavone (betaNF) induced the AHR-associated CYP1A1/1A2 pair in different liver regions, an effect not explained by the acinar distribution of the AHR protein. Here, we investigated AHR-associated regional induction by comparing the expression patterns of ALDH3 and GSTYa. Analysis of samples from periportal and perivenous cell lysates from 3MC-treated animals revealed that ALDH3 mRNA, protein and benzaldehyde-NADP associated activity were all confined to the perivenous region. In contrast, such regio-specific induction was not seen after beta-NF induction. Immunohistochemically, a peculiar mono- or oligocellular induction pattern of ALDH3 was seen, consistently surrounding terminal hepatic veins after 3MC but mainly in the midzonal region after betaNF. A ligand-specific difference in regional induction of GSTYa1 mRNA was also observed: The constitutive perivenous dominance was preserved after 3MC while induction by betaNF was mainly periportal. A 3MC-betaNF difference was also seen by immunohistochemistry and at the GSTYa protein level, in contrast to that of the AHR-unassociated GSTYb protein. However, experiments with hepatocytes isolated from the periportal or perivenous region to replicate these inducer-specific induction responses in vitro were unsuccessful. These data demonstrate that the different acinar induction patterns by 3MC and betaNF previously observed for CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 are seen also for two other Ah battery genes, GSTYa1 and ALDH3, but in a modified, gene-specific form. We hypothesize that unknown protein(s) operating in vivo and modifying the Ah-mediated response at the common XRE element located upstream of these genes is affected zonespecifically by 3MC and betaNF.
肿瘤相关醛脱氢酶3(ALDH3)和谷胱甘肽转移酶(GST)Ya形式由多环烃如2,3,7,8 - 四氯二苯并 - p - 二恶英(TCDD)在肝脏中激活的芳烃(Ah)基因家族成员编码。芳烃受体(AHR)的生理作用、其基因激活机制及其内源性配体仍未完全阐明。我们之前观察到,3 - 甲基胆蒽(3MC)和β - 萘黄酮(βNF)在不同肝区诱导AHR相关的CYP1A1/1A2对,这一效应无法用AHR蛋白的腺泡分布来解释。在此,我们通过比较ALDH3和GSTYa的表达模式来研究AHR相关的区域诱导。对3MC处理动物的门静脉周围和肝静脉周围细胞裂解物样本的分析显示,ALDH3 mRNA、蛋白和苯甲醛 - NADP相关活性均局限于肝静脉周围区域。相比之下,βNF诱导后未观察到这种区域特异性诱导。免疫组织化学显示,ALDH3呈现出独特的单细胞或寡细胞诱导模式,3MC处理后始终围绕终末肝静脉,而βNF处理后主要在中区。还观察到GSTYa1 mRNA区域诱导的配体特异性差异:3MC处理后门静脉周围的组成性优势得以保留,而βNF诱导主要在门静脉周围。免疫组织化学和GSTYa蛋白水平也显示出3MC与βNF的差异,这与AHR不相关的GSTYb蛋白不同。然而,用从门静脉周围或肝静脉周围区域分离的肝细胞进行体外实验以复制这些诱导剂特异性诱导反应未成功。这些数据表明先前观察到的3MC和βNF对CYP1A1和CYP1A2不同的腺泡诱导模式在另外两个Ah基因家族成员GSTYa1和ALDH3中也存在,但形式有所改变且具有基因特异性。我们推测,在体内起作用并在这些基因上游共同的XRE元件处修饰Ah介导反应的未知蛋白质受到3MC和βNF的区域特异性影响。