• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声辅助脂肪抽吸术的个人经验:一项比较超声辅助脂肪抽吸术与传统脂肪抽吸术的初步研究。

Personal experience with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty: a pilot study comparing ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty with traditional lipoplasty.

作者信息

Fodor P B, Watson J

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at the University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Apr;101(4):1103-16; discussion 1117-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199804040-00034.

DOI:10.1097/00006534-199804040-00034
PMID:9514348
Abstract

Body contouring with traditional suction-assisted lipoplasty is currently the most commonly performed aesthetic surgical procedure. In competent hands, traditional lipoplasty has a low complication rate, a short recovery period, and a high patient satisfaction rate. Body contouring with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty has recently gained considerable attention, and its proponents have claimed many benefits over the traditional method. This pilot study consists of one surgeon's clinical experience with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty in 100 cases. In 63 of these patients, ipsilateral traditional lipoplasty and contralateral ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty were done on one or more body areas. These patients were blinded in the study. Complication rates, lipocrits from the aspirate, postoperative ecchymosis, postoperative swelling, patient satisfaction, and surgeon satisfaction were then compared for each patient studied. Ten randomly selected patients were also evaluated by an independent panel of reviewers who compared ecchymosis and swelling in ultrasound-assisted versus traditional lipoplasty-treated areas. Their observations in this subset of 10 patients were subjected to statistical analysis. This initial pilot study failed to prove most of the benefits attributed to ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty by other surgeons. However, the method is an evolving technology, and the authors remain optimistic about the role of ultrasound in body sculpting surgery.

摘要

采用传统的吸脂辅助脂肪抽吸术进行身体塑形是目前最常施行的美容外科手术。在技术娴熟的医生手中,传统脂肪抽吸术并发症发生率低、恢复期短且患者满意度高。超声辅助脂肪抽吸术进行身体塑形最近受到了广泛关注,其支持者宣称该方法相较于传统方法有诸多优势。这项初步研究包含了一位外科医生对100例超声辅助脂肪抽吸术的临床经验。在这些患者中,有63例在一个或多个身体部位一侧进行传统脂肪抽吸术,另一侧进行超声辅助脂肪抽吸术。这些患者在研究中处于盲态。然后对每个研究患者的并发症发生率、吸出物的脂肪含量、术后瘀斑、术后肿胀、患者满意度和外科医生满意度进行比较。还由一个独立的评审小组对10例随机选择的患者进行评估,该小组比较了超声辅助脂肪抽吸术与传统脂肪抽吸术治疗区域的瘀斑和肿胀情况。他们对这10例患者的观察结果进行了统计分析。这项初步研究未能证实其他外科医生所宣称的超声辅助脂肪抽吸术的大部分优势。然而,该方法是一项不断发展的技术,作者对超声在身体塑形手术中的作用仍持乐观态度。

相似文献

1
Personal experience with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty: a pilot study comparing ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty with traditional lipoplasty.超声辅助脂肪抽吸术的个人经验:一项比较超声辅助脂肪抽吸术与传统脂肪抽吸术的初步研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Apr;101(4):1103-16; discussion 1117-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199804040-00034.
2
Extending the role of liposuction in body contouring with ultrasound-assisted liposuction.通过超声辅助吸脂术扩展吸脂在身体塑形中的作用。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Apr;101(4):1090-102; discussion 1117-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199804040-00033.
3
Personal experience with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty: a pilot study comparing ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty with traditional lipoplasty.超声辅助脂肪抽吸术的个人经验:一项比较超声辅助脂肪抽吸术与传统脂肪抽吸术的初步研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 May;113(6):1852-4. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000117666.29689.78.
4
Blood loss in major liposuction procedures: a comparison study using suction-assisted versus ultrasonically assisted lipoplasty.大型抽脂手术中的失血情况:一项使用吸脂辅助与超声辅助脂肪抽吸术的对比研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Jul;108(1):241-7; discussion 248-9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200107000-00039.
5
A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing laser-assisted lipoplasty with suction-assisted lipoplasty.一项比较激光辅助脂肪抽吸术与传统负压吸脂术的前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照临床试验。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep 15;118(4):1032-1045. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000232428.37926.48.
6
A multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial comparing VASER-assisted Lipoplasty and suction-assisted Lipoplasty.一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、单盲、对照临床试验,比较了 VASER 辅助脂肪抽吸术和传统脂肪抽吸术。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Apr;129(4):681e-689e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182442274.
7
Power-assisted lipoplasty (PAL): A clinical pilot study comparing PAL to traditional lipoplasty (TL).动力辅助脂肪抽吸术(PAL):一项将动力辅助脂肪抽吸术与传统脂肪抽吸术(TL)进行比较的临床初步研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999 Nov-Dec;23(6):379-85. doi: 10.1007/s002669900305.
8
Power-assisted lipoplasty versus traditional suction-assisted lipoplasty: comparative evaluation and analysis of output.动力辅助脂肪抽吸术与传统负压辅助脂肪抽吸术:输出量的比较评估与分析
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;29(1):49-52. doi: 10.1007/s00266-004-0003-y. Epub 2005 Mar 10.
9
Comparative analysis of blood loss in suction-assisted lipoplasty and third-generation internal ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty.吸脂辅助脂肪抽吸术与第三代体内超声辅助脂肪抽吸术失血情况的对比分析
Aesthet Surg J. 2008 Jul-Aug;28(4):430-5. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2008.04.002.
10
The tissue effects of ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty.超声辅助脂肪抽吸术的组织效应
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998 Jul;102(1):213-20. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199807000-00035.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Relevance of Skin Tightening with Minimally Invasive Subdermal Energy-Based (EB) Technologies.基于微创皮下能量(EB)技术的皮肤紧致的临床相关性
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05022-4.
2
Literature Review and Evidence-Based Comparative Analysis of Traditional Suction-Assisted Lipectomy (SAL) vs. Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction (UAL) Reported Outcomes.传统抽脂术(SAL)与超声辅助抽脂术(UAL)报告结果的文献综述及基于证据的对比分析
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04872-2.
3
Autologous Fat Grafting: The Science Behind the Surgery.
自体脂肪移植:手术背后的科学
Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Apr;36(4):488-96. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw004.
4
Liposuction devices: technology update.抽脂设备:技术更新
Med Devices (Auckl). 2014 Jul 21;7:241-51. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S47322. eCollection 2014.