Suppr超能文献

抗心律失常药物对接受室性心动过速和颤动电药理学检测患者QT间期离散度的影响。

Antiarrhythmic drug effects on QT interval dispersion in patients undergoing electropharmacologic testing for ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation.

作者信息

Gillis A M, Traboulsi M, Hii J T, Wyse D G, Duff H J, McDonald M, Mitchell L B

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Foothills Medical Center and the University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1998 Mar 1;81(5):588-93. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00967-3.

Abstract

The effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on QT interval dispersion as a predictor of antiarrhythmic drug therapy has not been rigorously assessed. This study was performed to determine whether the effects of antiarrhythmic drugs on QT interval dispersion predict antiarrhythmic drug response in patients undergoing electropharmacologic testing for ventricular tachycardiarrythmias. Precordial QT intervals and QT interval dispersions were measured at baseline and during steady-state antiarrhythmic drug therapy in 72 consecutive patients with documented coronary artery disease and remote myocardial infarction presenting with spontaneous sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias who underwent electropharmacologic studies to assess arrhythmia suppression. QT interval dispersion was similar at baseline in drug responders (42 +/- 21 ms) and drug nonresponders (46 +/- 21 ms), whereas during antiarrhythmic therapy QT interval dispersion was shorter in drug responders (33 +/- 15 ms) than in drug nonresponders (55 +/- 29 ms, p <0.001). QT interval dispersion was shorter in 7 drug responders during their effective drug trials (27 +/- 14 ms) than during their ineffective drug trials (47 +/- 24 ms, n = 9, p <0.05). QT dispersion < or = 50 ms (p <0.002) and a patent infarct-related artery (p <0.003) were independent predictors of antiarrhythmic therapy. The positive and negative predictive value of QT interval dispersion during drug therapy to predict a successful drug response was 32% and 96%, respectively. QT interval dispersion predicted the outcome of electropharmacologic studies independent of infarct-related artery patency. QT interval dispersion >50 ms during drug therapy was associated with ineffective drug therapy.

摘要

抗心律失常药物对QT间期离散度的影响作为抗心律失常药物治疗的预测指标尚未得到严格评估。本研究旨在确定抗心律失常药物对QT间期离散度的影响是否能预测接受室性快速性心律失常电药理学检测患者的抗心律失常药物反应。对72例有冠状动脉疾病和陈旧性心肌梗死记录、出现自发性持续性室性快速性心律失常并接受电药理学研究以评估心律失常抑制情况的连续患者,在基线时和抗心律失常药物治疗稳态期间测量胸前导联QT间期和QT间期离散度。药物反应者(42±21毫秒)和药物无反应者(46±21毫秒)在基线时QT间期离散度相似,而在抗心律失常治疗期间,药物反应者的QT间期离散度(33±15毫秒)短于药物无反应者(55±29毫秒,p<0.001)。7例药物反应者在有效药物试验期间的QT间期离散度(27±14毫秒)短于无效药物试验期间(47±24毫秒,n=9,p<0.05)。QT离散度≤50毫秒(p<0.002)和梗死相关动脉通畅(p<0.003)是抗心律失常治疗的独立预测指标。药物治疗期间QT间期离散度预测药物反应成功的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为32%和96%。QT间期离散度可独立于梗死相关动脉通畅情况预测电药理学研究结果。药物治疗期间QT间期离散度>50毫秒与药物治疗无效相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验