• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可变交配系统中的雄性亲代投入与父权

Male parental effort and paternity in a variable mating system.

作者信息

Whittingham LA, Dunn PO

机构信息

Evolutionary Ecology Group, Division of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University

出版信息

Anim Behav. 1998 Mar;55(3):629-40. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0751.

DOI:10.1006/anbe.1997.0751
PMID:9514682
Abstract

Recent theoretical models suggest that males may respond to changes in paternity by adjusting their parental effort. Male response will depend on the availability of reliable paternity cues and the relative costs and benefits of parental effort to the male (i.e. its effect on the survival of young and alternative mating opportunities). Males breeding in pairs may be constrained because reductions in male parental effort are unlikely to be compensated for by the female and thus the survival of both related and unrelated young may decrease. In contrast, males breeding in cooperative groups (i.e. with helpers or co-breeders) may not have this constraint if other individuals in the group compensate for reductions in male parental effort. White-browed scrubwrens, Sericornis frontalis, breed in pairs and cooperative groups, typically with one female and two males (alpha and beta). We found that male parental effort was related positively to paternity for beta males, but not for alpha or pair males. Alpha males had paternity in all broods and always fed young. In contrast, beta males often had no paternity and sometimes did not feed young. Time spent near the fertile female was not an accurate predictor of the percentage of young sired in a brood, but it was a good predictor of having sired young in a brood. Our results are consistent with the idea that male parental effort is allocated according to whether or not the male copulated with the female. We suggest that the relationship between male parental effort and paternity may vary among cooperatively breeding species depending on the type and availability of cues to a male's paternity. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

摘要

最近的理论模型表明,雄性可能会通过调整亲代投入来应对父权的变化。雄性的反应将取决于可靠的父权线索的可用性以及亲代投入对雄性的相对成本和收益(即其对幼崽存活和替代交配机会的影响)。成对繁殖的雄性可能会受到限制,因为雄性亲代投入的减少不太可能由雌性来弥补,因此相关和不相关幼崽的存活可能都会下降。相比之下,如果群体中的其他个体能够弥补雄性亲代投入的减少,那么在合作群体中繁殖的雄性(即与帮手或共同繁殖者一起)可能不会受到这种限制。白眉灌丛鹪鹩(Sericornis frontalis)以成对和合作群体的形式繁殖,通常是一只雌性和两只雄性(优势雄性和从属雄性)。我们发现,从属雄性的亲代投入与父权呈正相关,但优势雄性或成对雄性则不然。优势雄性在所有巢穴中都拥有父权,并且总是喂养幼崽。相比之下,从属雄性通常没有父权,有时也不喂养幼崽。在可育雌鸟附近花费的时间并不是一窝幼崽中由其授精的幼崽百分比的准确预测指标,但却是一窝中有其授精幼崽的良好预测指标。我们的结果与雄性亲代投入是根据雄性是否与雌性交配来分配的观点一致。我们认为,雄性亲代投入与父权之间的关系在合作繁殖物种中可能会有所不同,这取决于雄性父权线索的类型和可用性。版权所有1998动物行为研究协会 版权所有1998动物行为研究协会。

相似文献

1
Male parental effort and paternity in a variable mating system.可变交配系统中的雄性亲代投入与父权
Anim Behav. 1998 Mar;55(3):629-40. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0751.
2
Bi-parental vs. cooperative breeding in a passerine: fitness-maximizing strategies of males in response to risk of extra-pair paternity?雀形目鸟类中的双亲育雏与合作育雏:雄性应对配偶外交配风险的适应性最大化策略?
Mol Ecol. 2009 Sep;18(18):3929-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04336.x. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
3
Experimentally reduced paternity affects paternal effort and reproductive success in pied flycatchers.实验性降低的父权影响了斑姬鹟的父本投入和繁殖成功率。
Anim Behav. 1998 Feb;55(2):319-29. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0632.
4
Nest defense in the face of cuckoldry: evolutionary rather than facultative adaptation to chronic paternity loss.面对戴绿帽时的巢穴防御:对慢性亲代损失的进化适应而不是权宜之计。
BMC Evol Biol. 2019 Nov 4;19(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12862-019-1528-7.
5
How female reed buntings benefit from extra-pair mating behaviour: testing hypotheses through patterns of paternity in sequential broods.雌性芦鹀如何从配偶外交配行为中获益:通过连续窝雏的父权模式检验假设
Mol Ecol. 2006 Aug;15(9):2589-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02955.x.
6
Extraterritorial forays and male parental care in hooded warblers.暗色林莺的境外觅食行为与雄性亲代抚育
Anim Behav. 2000 Jun;59(6):1261-1269. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1436.
7
Sperm competition mechanisms, confidence of paternity, and the evolution of paternal care in the golden egg bug (Phyllomorpha laciniata).金龟蝽(Phyllomorpha laciniata)的精子竞争机制、父权信心与父性关怀的演化
Evolution. 2003 May;57(5):1078-88. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00317.x.
8
Certainty of paternity and paternal investment in eastern bluebirds and tree swallows.东部蓝鸲和树燕的父权确定性与父本投资
Anim Behav. 1998 Apr;55(4):845-60. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0667.
9
Devoted fathers or selfish lovers? Conflict between mating effort and parental care in a harem-defending arachnid.忠诚的父亲还是自私的情人?一种捍卫妻妾群的蛛形纲动物在交配努力与亲代抚育之间的冲突
J Evol Biol. 2017 Jan;30(1):191-201. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12998. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
10
Spatial patterns of extra-pair paternity: beyond paternity gains and losses.配偶外父权的空间模式:超越父权的得失
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Mar;84(2):518-31. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12293. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in helper effort among cooperatively breeding bird species is consistent with Hamilton's Rule.合作繁殖鸟类中帮手努力的变化与汉密尔顿规则一致。
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 24;7:12663. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12663.
2
Men's reproductive investment decisions : Mating, Parenting, and Self-perceived Mate Value.男性的生殖投资决策:交配、养育子女与自我感知的配偶价值。
Hum Nat. 2007 Mar;18(1):22-34. doi: 10.1007/BF02820844.
3
Paternity of subordinates raises cooperative effort in cichlids.下属的父权关系提高了丽鱼的合作努力。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025673. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
4
Living on the wedge: female control of paternity in a cooperatively polyandrous cichlid.在楔形栖息地生活:一种具有合作式多雄性的慈鲷中雌性对父权的控制。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 7;276(1676):4207-14. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1175. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
5
Parental conflict in birds: comparative analyses of offspring development, ecology and mating opportunities.鸟类中的亲代冲突:后代发育、生态学及交配机会的比较分析
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 7;275(1632):301-7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1395.