Whittingham LA, Dunn PO
Evolutionary Ecology Group, Division of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University
Anim Behav. 1998 Mar;55(3):629-40. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0751.
Recent theoretical models suggest that males may respond to changes in paternity by adjusting their parental effort. Male response will depend on the availability of reliable paternity cues and the relative costs and benefits of parental effort to the male (i.e. its effect on the survival of young and alternative mating opportunities). Males breeding in pairs may be constrained because reductions in male parental effort are unlikely to be compensated for by the female and thus the survival of both related and unrelated young may decrease. In contrast, males breeding in cooperative groups (i.e. with helpers or co-breeders) may not have this constraint if other individuals in the group compensate for reductions in male parental effort. White-browed scrubwrens, Sericornis frontalis, breed in pairs and cooperative groups, typically with one female and two males (alpha and beta). We found that male parental effort was related positively to paternity for beta males, but not for alpha or pair males. Alpha males had paternity in all broods and always fed young. In contrast, beta males often had no paternity and sometimes did not feed young. Time spent near the fertile female was not an accurate predictor of the percentage of young sired in a brood, but it was a good predictor of having sired young in a brood. Our results are consistent with the idea that male parental effort is allocated according to whether or not the male copulated with the female. We suggest that the relationship between male parental effort and paternity may vary among cooperatively breeding species depending on the type and availability of cues to a male's paternity. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.
最近的理论模型表明,雄性可能会通过调整亲代投入来应对父权的变化。雄性的反应将取决于可靠的父权线索的可用性以及亲代投入对雄性的相对成本和收益(即其对幼崽存活和替代交配机会的影响)。成对繁殖的雄性可能会受到限制,因为雄性亲代投入的减少不太可能由雌性来弥补,因此相关和不相关幼崽的存活可能都会下降。相比之下,如果群体中的其他个体能够弥补雄性亲代投入的减少,那么在合作群体中繁殖的雄性(即与帮手或共同繁殖者一起)可能不会受到这种限制。白眉灌丛鹪鹩(Sericornis frontalis)以成对和合作群体的形式繁殖,通常是一只雌性和两只雄性(优势雄性和从属雄性)。我们发现,从属雄性的亲代投入与父权呈正相关,但优势雄性或成对雄性则不然。优势雄性在所有巢穴中都拥有父权,并且总是喂养幼崽。相比之下,从属雄性通常没有父权,有时也不喂养幼崽。在可育雌鸟附近花费的时间并不是一窝幼崽中由其授精的幼崽百分比的准确预测指标,但却是一窝中有其授精幼崽的良好预测指标。我们的结果与雄性亲代投入是根据雄性是否与雌性交配来分配的观点一致。我们认为,雄性亲代投入与父权之间的关系在合作繁殖物种中可能会有所不同,这取决于雄性父权线索的类型和可用性。版权所有1998动物行为研究协会 版权所有1998动物行为研究协会。