Suppr超能文献

[外固定在胫骨近端骨折中的价值]

[Value of external fixation in proximal tibial fractures].

作者信息

Bonnevialle P, Fouque E, Cariven P, Bertin R, Asencio G, Mansat M

机构信息

Service d'Orthopédie Traumatologie, Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse.

出版信息

Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1997;83(7):602-12.

PMID:9515128
Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

This study was a retrospective analysis of 39 proximal metaphyseal tibial fractures treated by Orthofix fixator in two trauma departments.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

There were 28 men and 10 women with a mean age of 49.5 years. 13 pedestrians were stroked by a car and 18 had a traffic accident on a motorcycle. In 27 cases, the fracture was open with following Cauchoix grading: 15 types 2, 6 types 1 and 6 types 3. All fractures were partially or totally included in the proximal epiphyseal square of the AO system. 14 fractures were metaphyseal, 13 diaphyso-metaphyseal and 12 had an articular irradiation. All external fixations were performed using the Orthofix device, with image intensification. A partial weight bearing was allowed for 2.4 months as an average and full weight bearing at mean 3.7 months. 7 skin grafts, 2 micro surgical (latissimus dorsi) and 2 local flaps were necessary.

RESULTS

In 3 patients this technique failed. 3 patients had an autologous bone graft at the metaphyseal and 2 at the diaphyseal fracture site. 30 patients healed without other procedure after an average delay of 5.5 months. During the healing and weight bearing time, 6 frontal deformities appeared and 5 flexion contractures were not reoperated. With a minimum follow up of one year (mean 3 years) 22 fractures had no deformity, 8 had a valgus deformity (5 degrees to 10 degrees) and 3 a varus deformity (6 to 17 degrees). For the 25 patients with an isolated proximal tibial fracture, 11 (44%) had an excellent functional result (no pain, full range knee motion, normal daily activity); 12 (48%) had a good result (episodic pain, minimally knee discomfort, flexion limitation).

DISCUSSION

Orthofix fixator appear to be a good solution for comminuted fractures. These fractures have anatomical and epidemiological particularities. AO classification system is not useful; a new one is proposed. External fixator must be placed meticulously after closed fracture reduction.

摘要

研究目的

本研究是对两个创伤科室采用Orthofix外固定架治疗的39例胫骨近端干骺端骨折进行的回顾性分析。

材料与方法

患者共38例,其中男性28例,女性10例,平均年龄49.5岁。13例为行人被汽车撞伤,18例为骑摩托车发生交通事故。27例骨折为开放性骨折,根据Cauchoix分级:15例为2型,6例为1型,6例为3型。所有骨折均部分或完全包含在AO系统的近端骨骺方形区域内。14例为干骺端骨折,13例为骨干 - 干骺端骨折,12例涉及关节面。所有外固定均使用Orthofix装置并在影像增强器辅助下进行。平均2.4个月允许部分负重,平均3.7个月完全负重。7例行植皮术,2例行显微外科手术(背阔肌),2例行局部皮瓣手术。

结果

3例患者该技术失败。3例患者在干骺端骨折部位进行了自体骨移植,2例在骨干骨折部位进行了自体骨移植。30例患者平均延迟5.5个月后未进行其他手术而愈合。在愈合和负重期间,出现6例 frontal 畸形,5例屈曲挛缩未再次手术。随访至少1年(平均3年),22例骨折无畸形,8例有外翻畸形(5度至10度),3例有内翻畸形(6度至17度)。对于25例单纯胫骨近端骨折患者,11例(44%)功能结果优秀(无疼痛,膝关节活动范围正常,日常活动正常);12例(48%)结果良好(偶发疼痛,膝关节轻度不适,屈曲受限)。

讨论

Orthofix外固定架似乎是治疗粉碎性骨折的良好解决方案。这些骨折具有解剖学和流行病学特殊性。AO分类系统无用,提出了一种新的分类系统。外固定架必须在闭合性骨折复位后精心放置。

原文中“frontal deformities”的“frontal”翻译存疑,可能有误,建议结合完整病历资料进一步确认准确含义,但按照要求未添加其他解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验