Weiss D B, Gottschalk-Sabag S, Bar-On E, Zukerman Z
Kupat Cholim Meuhedet, Jerusalem.
Harefuah. 1998 Jan 15;134(2):97-101, 159.
We determined whether a single testicular specimen is sufficient to represent qualitatively the spermatogenic process within the testes of azoospermic or severely oligospermic infertile men. In 191 testes of azoospermic patients and in 26 of those with severe oligospermia, fine needle aspirations at 3 different sites of each testis were performed. Aspirated material from each puncture was stained and in each smear all spermatogenic cells, as well as Sertoli cells, were identified. Testes were classified according to the most mature spermatogenic cell type present, or the presence of only Sertoli cells. The homogeneity of the testicular spermatogenic process was then evaluated. There was an overall intratesticular difference between aspirates in 14.1% of azoospermic testes and in 26.9% of severely oligospermic testes with regard to the most mature spermatogenic cell type. When spermatozoa were the most mature cell type, they were detected in all of the 3 aspirates in 71.4% of the testes. In 18.4% or 10.2% of this group of testes they were retrieved in only 1 or 2 of the aspirates, respectively. In testes in which spermatids or spermatocytes were the most mature spermatogenic stage, these cell types were detected in all 3 aspirates in only 36.4% and 68.0%, respectively. In azoospermic patients with full testicular spermatogenesis, the likelihood of retrieving spermatozoa from the testes was 84.3%, 92.7% and 100% in 1, 2 and 3 specimens, respectively. The following conclusions were drawn: There is a wide range of testicular heterogeneity in azoospermia or very severe oligospermia for diagnosing the testicular spermatogenic pattern. In azoospermia, specimens from several testicular sites are required. It is strongly recommended that no assisted fertilization be offered to azoospermic patients unless prior evaluation of the spermatogenic pattern in the seminiferous tubules is determined.
我们确定了单个睾丸标本是否足以定性地代表无精子症或严重少精子症不育男性睾丸内的生精过程。对191例无精子症患者的睾丸和26例严重少精子症患者的睾丸,在每个睾丸的3个不同部位进行细针穿刺抽吸。对每次穿刺获取的材料进行染色,并在每个涂片上识别所有生精细胞以及支持细胞。根据存在的最成熟生精细胞类型或仅存在支持细胞的情况对睾丸进行分类。然后评估睾丸生精过程的同质性。在无精子症睾丸中,14.1%以及在严重少精子症睾丸中26.9%的抽吸物在最成熟生精细胞类型方面存在总体睾丸内差异。当精子是最成熟细胞类型时,在71.4%的睾丸中,所有3次抽吸物中均检测到精子。在该组睾丸中,分别有18.4%或10.2%的睾丸仅在1次或2次抽吸物中检测到精子。在以精子细胞或精母细胞为生精最成熟阶段的睾丸中,这些细胞类型分别仅在36.4%和68.0%的所有3次抽吸物中被检测到。在睾丸生精功能完全正常的无精子症患者中,从1个、2个和3个标本中获取精子的可能性分别为84.3%、92.7%和100%。得出以下结论:在无精子症或非常严重的少精子症中,用于诊断睾丸生精模式的睾丸异质性范围很广。在无精子症中,需要从睾丸的多个部位获取标本。强烈建议在确定曲细精管中生精模式的先前评估之前,不要为无精子症患者提供辅助受精。