Lee B W, Wain J C, Kelsey K T, Wiencke J K, Christiani D C
Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02115, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Mar;157(3 Pt 1):748-55. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.3.9707025.
Prior studies have suggested that lung cancers that arise in association with cigarette smoking favor an upper-lobe location while those associated with asbestos exposure favor a lower-lobe location. An excess of adenocarcinomas has also been reported among cases not exposed to cigarette smoke as well as among those exposed to asbestos. However, these studies typically have not adjusted adequately for potential confounders such as the patient's age, sex, race, or family history of cancer. To better examine the effects of cigarette smoking and asbestos exposure on location and histology of lung cancer, we analyzed data from a large case-control study that included 456 patients with stage I or II lung cancer. Patients with upper-lobe tumors tended to have had more exposure to tobacco as assessed by pack-years smoked (54.7 versus 46.2, p = 0.07) and less time since quitting smoking (3.0 versus 5.5 yr, p = 0.05). In contrast to some prior reports, asbestos exposure was also associated with an upper-lobe location of tumor. Among those with upper-lobe tumors, 14.6% had a history of significant asbestos exposure compared with 5.4% of those with lower-lobe tumors (p < 0.01). The relationship between asbestos exposure and upper-lobe location of tumor was also statistically significant whether stratified by smoking or analyzed by multivariable logistic regression modeling. Adenocarcinomas were more likely among those with less exposure to cigarette smoke based on fewer pack-years smoked (41.5 versus 61.8, p = 0.0001) and more time since quitting smoking (5.0 versus 3.0 yr, p = 0.02). The proportion of patients with significant exposure to asbestos was lower among those with adenocarcinomas but was not statistically significant (9.5 versus 15.3%, p = 0.09). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, longer time since smoking exposure remained a significant predictor of adenocarcinomas (p < 0.02), but history of asbestos exposure did not predict tumor histology. Thus, in patients with lung cancer, both cigarette smoking and asbestos exposure histories favor an upper-lobe location of tumor. Longer time since smoking exposure favors adenocarcinomas, but the history of asbestos exposure does not appear to influence the tumor histology.
先前的研究表明,与吸烟相关的肺癌多发生在上叶,而与接触石棉相关的肺癌多发生在下叶。在未接触香烟烟雾的病例以及接触石棉的病例中,腺癌的比例也有所增加。然而,这些研究通常没有充分考虑潜在的混杂因素,如患者的年龄、性别、种族或癌症家族史。为了更好地研究吸烟和接触石棉对肺癌位置和组织学的影响,我们分析了一项大型病例对照研究的数据,该研究纳入了456例I期或II期肺癌患者。上叶肿瘤患者的吸烟暴露量(以吸烟包年数评估)往往更多(54.7对46.2,p = 0.07),戒烟时间更短(3.0对5.5年,p = 0.05)。与一些先前的报告相反,接触石棉也与肿瘤的上叶位置有关。在上叶肿瘤患者中,14.6%有大量石棉接触史,而下叶肿瘤患者中这一比例为5.4%(p < 0.01)。无论按吸烟分层还是通过多变量逻辑回归模型分析,石棉接触与肿瘤上叶位置之间的关系在统计学上也具有显著性。基于吸烟包年数较少(41.5对61.8,p = 0.0001)和戒烟时间更长(5.0对3.0年,p = 0.02),腺癌在吸烟暴露较少的患者中更常见。腺癌患者中大量接触石棉的比例较低,但无统计学显著性(9.5%对15.3%,p = 0.09)。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,吸烟暴露后时间较长仍然是腺癌的一个显著预测因素(p < 0.02),但石棉接触史并不能预测肿瘤组织学。因此,在肺癌患者中,吸烟和石棉接触史都有利于肿瘤发生在上叶。吸烟暴露后时间较长有利于腺癌的发生,但石棉接触史似乎并不影响肿瘤组织学。