• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Quality of reviews in epidemiology.流行病学综述的质量。
Am J Public Health. 1998 Mar;88(3):475-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.3.475.
2
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.系统评价的流行病学及报告特征
PLoS Med. 2007 Mar 27;4(3):e78. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040078.
3
Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.发表于中文期刊的护理干预系统评价和Meta分析的流行病学、质量及报告特征
Nurs Outlook. 2015 Jul-Aug;63(4):446-455.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.11.020. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
4
Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature.评估急诊医学文献中系统评价的质量。
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;38(5):518-26. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.115881.
5
Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.中文期刊发表的关于中医护理干预的系统评价和Meta分析的流行病学特征、报告特征及方法学质量
Int J Nurs Pract. 2017 Feb;23(1). doi: 10.1111/ijn.12498. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
6
Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology.Cochrane皮肤组的系统评价在方法学上比皮肤科领域的其他系统评价更为严谨。
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Dec;155(6):1230-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07496.x.
7
The methodological quality of systematic reviews published in high-impact nursing journals: a review of the literature.发表于高影响力护理期刊的系统评价的方法学质量：文献综述
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Feb;23(3-4):315-32. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12132. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
8
Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions published in Chinese journals.中文期刊发表的针灸干预系统评价的流行病学、质量和报告特征。
J Altern Complement Med. 2012 Sep;18(9):813-7. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0274.
9
Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines.兽医期刊中系统评价对系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目（PRISMA）文献检索报告指南的遵循情况。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jul;105(3):233-239. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.246. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
10
Clinical trial registry use in anaesthesiology systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library.临床研究注册在麻醉学系统评价中的应用：对发表在麻醉学期刊和 Cochrane 图书馆中的系统评价进行的横断面研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Dec;34(12):797-807. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000671.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of reviews on sugar-sweetened beverages and health outcomes: a systematic review.含糖饮料与健康结局相关的评价质量：系统评价。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 Nov;94(5):1340-7. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.015875. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
2
Guidelines for rating Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF).功能全面评估量表（GAF）评级指南。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2011 Jan 20;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-10-2.
3
A systematic review of the prevalence of schizophrenia.精神分裂症患病率的系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2005 May;2(5):e141. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020141. Epub 2005 May 31.
4
Systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence.糖尿病流行病学的系统评价：寻找证据。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Jan 8;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-2.
5
A systematic review of the incidence of schizophrenia: the distribution of rates and the influence of sex, urbanicity, migrant status and methodology.精神分裂症发病率的系统评价：发病率分布以及性别、城市化程度、移民身份和方法学的影响。
BMC Med. 2004 Apr 28;2:13. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-13.
6
Methods in epidemiology and public health: does practice match theory?流行病学与公共卫生方法：实践与理论相符吗？
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Feb;55(2):104-10. doi: 10.1136/jech.55.2.104.

本文引用的文献

1
Locating and appraising systematic reviews.查找和评估系统评价
Ann Intern Med. 1997 Apr 1;126(7):532-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-7-199704010-00006.
2
The practice of causal inference in cancer epidemiology.癌症流行病学中的因果推断实践。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Apr;5(4):303-11.
3
Epidemiology of testicular cancer.睾丸癌流行病学
Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(2):433-49. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036202.
4
Etiology of Wilms' tumor.肾母细胞瘤的病因
Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(2):415-32. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036201.
5
Etiology of brain tumors in adults.成人脑肿瘤的病因
Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(2):382-414. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036200.
6
Epidemiology of intracerebral hemorrhage.脑出血的流行病学
Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(2):361-81. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036199.
7
Epidemiology of age-related maculopathy.年龄相关性黄斑病变的流行病学
Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(2):347-60. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036198.
8
Risk factors for age-related cataracts.年龄相关性白内障的危险因素。
Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(2):336-46. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036197.
9
Review of the factors modulating dengue transmission.登革热传播调节因素综述。
Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(2):321-35. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036196.
10
Emergence of cryptococcal disease: epidemiologic perspectives 100 years after its discovery.隐球菌病的出现：发现100年后的流行病学视角
Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(2):303-20. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036195.

流行病学综述的质量。

Quality of reviews in epidemiology.

作者信息

Breslow R A, Ross S A, Weed D L

机构信息

Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Md. 20892-7344, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1998 Mar;88(3):475-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.3.475.

DOI:10.2105/ajph.88.3.475
PMID:9518988
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1508358/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the quality of recent reviews in epidemiology.

METHODS

All 1995 issues of 7 widely read epidemiology journals were searched to identify reviews.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine reviews were identified. Methodology was not specified or incomplete for literature searches in 79% of reviews; the same was true for inclusion criteria in 83% and for combining studies in 62%. More than 60% of the reviews were not methodologically systematic.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to improve the quality of review papers in epidemiology. If systematic methodology were followed more frequently, epidemiologic science and its application could be improved.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了近期流行病学综述的质量。

方法

检索了7种广泛阅读的流行病学杂志1995年的所有期刊以识别综述。

结果

共识别出29篇综述。79%的综述未明确说明或未完整描述文献检索方法；83%的综述在纳入标准方面存在同样问题，62%的综述在合并研究方面存在同样问题。超过60%的综述在方法学上缺乏系统性。

结论

有必要提高流行病学综述论文的质量。如果更频繁地遵循系统的方法学，流行病学科学及其应用将会得到改善。