Suppr超能文献

β受体阻滞剂与钙通道阻滞剂联合应用治疗稳定型慢性心绞痛的药理学及治疗学基础

Pharmacological and therapeutic basis for combined administration of beta blockers and calcium channel blockers in the treatment of stable chronic angina.

作者信息

Spaulding C, Cabanes L, Weber S

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Cochin Hospital, René Descartes University, Paris, France.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pract Suppl. 1997 Apr;88:17-22.

PMID:9519503
Abstract

Pharmacodynamics of beta-adrenergic blockers and dihydropyridines are potentially synergic in the treatment of angina pectoris. The anti-ischaemic effect of beta blockers is mainly the consequence of reductions in heart rate and inotropism, while DHPs promote afterload reduction and coronary vasodilation. Furthermore, beta blockers antagonise the possible dihydropyridines-induced reflex sympathetic activation. Despite these mechanistic considerations the results of clinical trials are not homogeneous. Differences in the assessment of the beta blocker-dihydropyridines connection are due to differences in trial design, dosage and formulation of both dihydropyridines and beta-blockers, and in baseline characteristics of the study population. The predominant finding is that a combination of a dihydropyridines and a beta blocker is not superior to either drug alone as a first step treatment of unselected patients with stable or unstable angina. In contrast, combination therapy is often efficacious when residual ischaemia is present under dihydropyridines or beta blocker monotherapy. That this combination is usually well tolerated thus appears to represent a useful treatment of severe angina pectoris. Combination of a non-dihydropyridines calcium antagonist such as diltiazem or verapamil with a beta blocker offers similar synergistic anti-ischaemic effects, but the addition of their negative chronotropic action may lead to severe bradycardia and thus limit its usefulness, especially in elderly patients with conduction disturbances.

摘要

β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂与二氢吡啶类药物在治疗心绞痛方面可能具有协同作用。β受体阻滞剂的抗缺血作用主要是心率和心肌收缩力降低的结果,而二氢吡啶类药物可促进后负荷降低和冠状动脉扩张。此外,β受体阻滞剂可拮抗二氢吡啶类药物可能引起的反射性交感神经激活。尽管有这些机制上的考虑,但临床试验结果并不一致。对β受体阻滞剂与二氢吡啶类药物联合应用评估的差异,是由于试验设计、二氢吡啶类药物和β受体阻滞剂的剂量及剂型,以及研究人群的基线特征不同所致。主要的发现是,对于未选择的稳定型或不稳定型心绞痛患者,二氢吡啶类药物与β受体阻滞剂联合应用并不优于单独使用任何一种药物作为初始治疗。相比之下,当二氢吡啶类药物或β受体阻滞剂单药治疗仍存在残余缺血时,联合治疗通常是有效的。这种联合治疗通常耐受性良好,因此似乎是治疗严重心绞痛的一种有效方法。非二氢吡啶类钙拮抗剂(如地尔硫䓬或维拉帕米)与β受体阻滞剂联合应用可产生类似的协同抗缺血作用,但它们的负性变时作用可能导致严重心动过缓,从而限制其应用,尤其是在有传导障碍的老年患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验