Bowers T R, O'Neill W W, Grines C, Pica M C, Safian R D, Goldstein J A
Division of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073-6769, USA.
N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 2;338(14):933-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804023381401.
Although the salutary effects of reperfusion in patients with left ventricular infarction are well documented, the benefits in patients with acute right ventricular infarction are less clear.
To determine whether primary angioplasty improves right ventricular function and the clinical outcome in patients with right ventricular infarction, we performed echocardiographic studies before and after angioplasty in 53 patients with acute right ventricular infarction.
Complete reperfusion, defined as normal flow in the right main coronary artery and its major right ventricular branches, was achieved in 41 patients (77 percent), leading to prompt and striking recovery of right ventricular function (mean [+/-SE] score for free-wall motion, 3.0+/-0.1 at base line and 1.4+/-0.1 at three days; P<0.001). Twelve patients (23 percent) had unsuccessful reperfusion, defined as the failure to restore right ventricular branch flow, with or without patency of the right main coronary artery. Unsuccessful reperfusion was associated with lack of recovery of right ventricular function (score for free-wall motion, 3.2+/-0.2 at base line and 3.0+/-0.9 at three days; P= 0.55), as well as persistent hypotension and low cardiac output (in 83 percent of the patients, vs. 12 percent of those with successful reperfusion; P=0.002) and a high mortality rate (58 percent, vs. 2 percent for those with successful reperfusion; P=0.001).
In patients with right ventricular infarction, complete reperfusion of the right coronary artery by angioplasty results in the dramatic recovery of right ventricular performance and an excellent clinical outcome. In contrast, unsuccessful reperfusion is associated with impaired recovery of right ventricular function, persistent hemodynamic compromise, and a high mortality rate.
尽管左心室梗死患者再灌注的有益效果已有充分记录,但急性右心室梗死患者的获益尚不清楚。
为了确定直接血管成形术是否能改善右心室梗死患者的右心室功能和临床结局,我们对53例急性右心室梗死患者在血管成形术前和术后进行了超声心动图研究。
41例患者(77%)实现了完全再灌注,定义为右冠状动脉主干及其主要右心室分支血流正常,这导致右心室功能迅速且显著恢复(游离壁运动平均[±标准误]评分,基线时为3.0±0.1,三天时为1.4±0.1;P<0.001)。12例患者(23%)再灌注未成功,定义为未能恢复右心室分支血流,无论右冠状动脉主干是否通畅。再灌注未成功与右心室功能未恢复相关(游离壁运动评分,基线时为3.2±0.2,三天时为3.0±0.9;P=0.55),以及持续性低血压和低心输出量(83%的患者出现,而成功再灌注的患者为12%;P=0.002)和高死亡率(58%,而成功再灌注的患者为2%;P=0.001)。
在右心室梗死患者中,通过血管成形术实现右冠状动脉完全再灌注可导致右心室功能显著恢复和良好的临床结局。相比之下,再灌注未成功与右心室功能恢复受损、持续性血流动力学障碍和高死亡率相关。