• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

担忧与风险认知。

Worry and risk perception.

作者信息

Sjöberg L

机构信息

Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 1998 Feb;18(1):85-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00918.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00918.x
PMID:9523446
Abstract

Risk perception is sometimes measured by means of judgments about worry, sometimes as perceived risk more directly. However, perceived level of risk calls for a more intellectual judgment and worry tends to refer to emotional reactions. These two are therefore not the same and need not be strongly correlated. Results reported here show that perceived risk and worry are indeed weakly correlated, both for generalized worry and for more specific measures of worry matched with the same hazard as risk ratings. A distinction is suggested between cognitive, abstract hazards and concrete, sensory hazards, with implications for the worry-perceived risk relationship. It was furthermore found by means of cluster analysis that there were groups of subject displaying different dynamics of risk and worry.

摘要

风险认知有时通过对担忧的判断来衡量,有时则更直接地作为感知到的风险来衡量。然而,感知到的风险水平需要更理性的判断,而担忧往往指的是情绪反应。因此,这两者并不相同,也不一定有很强的相关性。此处报告的结果表明,无论是对于广泛性担忧,还是对于与风险评级中相同危害相匹配的更具体的担忧衡量指标,感知到的风险与担忧确实呈弱相关。有人提出应区分认知性、抽象性危害和具体的、感官性危害,这对担忧与感知风险的关系有影响。此外,通过聚类分析发现,存在几组受试者表现出不同的风险和担忧动态。

相似文献

1
Worry and risk perception.担忧与风险认知。
Risk Anal. 1998 Feb;18(1):85-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00918.x.
2
Worry propensity and the perception of risk.担忧倾向与风险认知。
Behav Res Ther. 2001 Jun;39(6):721-9. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(00)00037-1.
3
Generalized anxiety disorder with and without excessive worry in Hong Kong.香港广泛性焦虑障碍及伴有过度担忧者。
Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(10):956-61. doi: 10.1002/da.20578.
4
Exploring behavioral pattern separation and risk for emotional disorders.探索行为模式分离与情绪障碍风险。
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Oct;59:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
5
Contribution of concrete cognition to emotion: neutral symptoms as elicitors of worry about cancer.
J Appl Psychol. 1989 Oct;74(5):787-96. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.787.
6
Cognitive and emotional aspects of fear of recurrence: predictors and relations with adjustment in young to middle-aged cancer survivors.恐惧复发的认知和情绪方面:对年轻到中年癌症幸存者适应的预测因素及关系。
Psychooncology. 2013 Jul;22(7):1630-8. doi: 10.1002/pon.3195. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
7
Worry and risk perception of breast cancer in a prevention trial of low dose tamoxifen in midlife postmenopausal hormone users.低剂量他莫昔芬对中年绝经后激素使用者乳腺癌预防试验中的担忧与风险认知
Breast. 2017 Aug;34:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 May 29.
8
Determinants of priority for risk reduction: the role of worry.降低风险的优先级决定因素:担忧的作用。
Risk Anal. 2000 Aug;20(4):413-27. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.204041.
9
Worry versus anxiety. Is there really a difference?担忧与焦虑。真的有区别吗?
Behav Modif. 1998 Jan;22(1):45-61. doi: 10.1177/01454455980221003.
10
The role of meta-cognition and parenting in adolescent worry.元认知和教养方式在青少年担忧中的作用。
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Jan;25(1):71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of social and psychological factors on smartphone usage during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间社会和心理因素对智能手机使用的影响。
Digit Health. 2024 Nov 14;10:20552076241298482. doi: 10.1177/20552076241298482. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Virtual resonance: analyzing IPA usage intensity under COVID-19's isolating canopy.虚拟共鸣:在 COVID-19 的隔离环境下分析 IPA 使用强度。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 1;14(1):15048. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64809-8.
3
Can major public health emergencies increase the participation of commercial insurance? Evidence from China.
重大公共卫生事件能否增加商业保险参与度?来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 23;12:1363451. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1363451. eCollection 2024.
4
Media exposure to climate change information and pro-environmental behavior: the role of climate change risk judgment.媒体对气候变化信息的接触与亲环境行为:气候变化风险判断的作用。
BMC Psychol. 2024 May 11;12(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01771-0.
5
Social carrying capacity and emotion dynamics in urban national parks during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间城市国家公园的社会承载能力与情绪动态
J Outdoor Recreat Tour. 2023 Mar;41:100451. doi: 10.1016/j.jort.2021.100451. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
6
Coping and risk perception during the COVID-19 pandemic in type 2 diabetes: Does it influence metabolic control?2型糖尿病患者在新冠疫情期间的应对方式及风险认知:这会影响代谢控制吗?
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Feb 13;4(2):e0002793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002793. eCollection 2024.
7
Perceived and Objective Fertility Risk Among Female Survivors of Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer.青少年及青年期癌症女性幸存者的感知和客观生育风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2337245. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37245.
8
Visualizing risky situations induces a stronger neural response in brain areas associated with mental imagery and emotions than visualizing non-risky situations.与想象非危险情境相比,想象危险情境会在与心理意象和情绪相关的脑区诱发更强的神经反应。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Sep 19;17:1207364. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1207364. eCollection 2023.
9
Impacts of social isolation and risk perception on social networking intensity among university students during covid-19.新冠疫情期间社会隔离和风险认知对大学生社交网络强度的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 28;18(4):e0283997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283997. eCollection 2023.
10
Geographic and demographic variation in worry about extreme heat and COVID-19 risk in summer 2020.2020年夏季对极端高温和新冠病毒疾病风险担忧的地理和人口统计学差异
Appl Geogr. 2023 Mar;152:102876. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102876. Epub 2023 Jan 16.