Riley B B, Perna R, Tate D G, Forchheimer M, Anderson C, Luera G
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Mar;79(3):258-64. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90004-1.
Derive a spiritual well-being classification and thereby enhance understanding of the relation between spiritual well-being, quality of life (QOL), and health among persons with chronic illness or disability.
Cluster analyses were performed to develop a spiritual well-being classification. Analysis of variance was used to compare cluster groups on various dimensions of QOL.
Part of a larger QOL study conducted at a midwestern medical center.
A convenience sample of 216 inpatients: amputation (n = 74), postpolio (n = 37), spinal cord injury (n = 34), breast cancer (n = 36), and prostate cancer (n = 35). Minors were excluded from the study.
Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT), Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC), Sickness Impact Profile (SIP), Medical Outcome Survey-Short Form (SF-36), and the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS).
Three types of spiritual well-being were identified: religious (n = 146), existential (n = 37), and nonspiritual (n = 30). Significant cluster differences (p < .03 to p < .001) were observed across all QOL domains and life satisfaction. Compared with the other cluster groups, the nonspiritual group reported significantly lower levels of QOL and life satisfaction and the highest proportion of health status change with respect to both improvement and decline in health.
Three types of spiritual well-being were empirically identified in this sample. Subtypes differed significantly with respect to various aspects of QOL. Further research is needed to validate this classification and to determine if type of spiritual well-being has a causal effect on treatment outcome or on the recovery process.
推导一种精神健康分类方法,从而增进对慢性病患者或残疾人士的精神健康、生活质量(QOL)和健康之间关系的理解。
进行聚类分析以建立精神健康分类。采用方差分析在生活质量的各个维度上比较聚类组。
在一家中西部医疗中心进行的一项更大规模生活质量研究的一部分。
216名住院患者的便利样本:截肢患者(n = 74)、小儿麻痹后遗症患者(n = 37)、脊髓损伤患者(n = 34)、乳腺癌患者(n = 36)和前列腺癌患者(n = 35)。未成年人被排除在研究之外。
精神健康量表(SWBS)、癌症治疗功能评估(FACT)、癌症功能生活指数(FLIC)、疾病影响概况(SIP)、医学结果调查简表(SF - 36)和生活满意度量表(SWLS)。
确定了三种精神健康类型:宗教型(n = 146)、存在主义型(n = 37)和非精神型(n = 30)。在所有生活质量领域和生活满意度方面均观察到显著的聚类差异(p < .03至p < .001)。与其他聚类组相比,非精神型组的生活质量和生活满意度水平显著较低,并且在健康改善和健康下降方面健康状况变化的比例最高。
在该样本中通过实证确定了三种精神健康类型。各亚型在生活质量的各个方面存在显著差异。需要进一步研究以验证该分类,并确定精神健康类型是否对治疗结果或康复过程有因果影响。