Quinlan J J, Homanics G E, Firestone L L
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Anesthesiology. 1998 Mar;88(3):775-80. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199803000-00030.
The mammalian gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor, a likely target of anesthetic action, exhibits remarkable subunit heterogeneity. In vitro expression studies suggest that there is subunit specificity to anesthetic responses at the GABA(A) receptor. The authors tested whether genetically engineered mice that lack the beta3 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor differed in their sensitivities to several general anesthetic agents.
Median effective concentrations for loss-of-righting reflex and tail clamp/withdrawal for enflurane and halothane were determined in mice with and without the beta3 gene and gene product. Sleep time was measured after intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital, ethanol, etomidate, and midazolam.
Null allele mice (beta3 -/-) did not differ from wild-type mice (beta3 +/+) in the obtunding response to enflurane and halothane but were significantly more resistant to enflurane (null allele half-effect concentrations [EC50] of 2.59 +/- 0.10 vs. wild-type EC50 of 2.06 +/- 0.12 atm %, P < 0.001) and halothane (null allele EC50 of 1.73 +/- 0.04 vs. wild-type EC50 of 1.59 +/- 0.05 atm %, P = 0.01) as determined by tail clamp response. Wild-type and null allele mice exhibited divergent responses to other sedative agents active at the GABA(A) receptor. No differences were noted in sleep times after administration of pentobarbital and ethanol, but null allele mice were more resistant to etomidate (null allele EC50 of 17.8 +/- 1.9 min vs. wild-type EC50 of 26.2 +/- 2.4 min, P < 0.02) and midazolam (null allele EC50 of 14.2 +/- 7.8 min vs. wild-type EC50 of 41.3 +/- 10.4 min, P < 0.05).
The beta3 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor appears to be important in the mediation of the immobilizing (tail clamp) but not obtunding (loss-of-righting reflex) effects of the volatile anesthetic agents enflurane and halothane. These data support the hypotheses that separate components of the anesthetic state are mediated via different central nervous system loci; that the GABA(A) receptor is a likely target for the immobilizing response to volatile anesthetic agents; and that the beta3 subunit plays a direct or indirect role in the mediation of this response. Absence of the beta3 subunit appears to attenuate the obtunding effect of midazolam and etomidate but appears not to alter the obtunding effect of pentobarbital, enflurane, and halothane, suggesting that these anesthetic agents produce hypnosis by different specific molecular mechanisms.
哺乳动物γ-氨基丁酸A型(GABA(A))受体可能是麻醉作用的靶点,表现出显著的亚基异质性。体外表达研究表明,GABA(A)受体对麻醉反应存在亚基特异性。作者测试了缺乏GABA(A)受体β3亚基的基因工程小鼠对几种全身麻醉剂的敏感性是否不同。
在有或无β3基因及基因产物的小鼠中,测定安氟醚和氟烷使翻正反射消失及夹尾/缩腿反应的半数有效浓度。腹腔注射戊巴比妥、乙醇、依托咪酯和咪达唑仑后测量睡眠时间。
无效等位基因小鼠(β3 -/-)与野生型小鼠(β3 +/+)对安氟醚和氟烷的抑制反应无差异,但通过夹尾反应测定,无效等位基因小鼠对安氟醚(无效等位基因半数效应浓度[EC50]为2.59±0.10,野生型EC50为2.06±0.12 atm%,P<0.001)和氟烷(无效等位基因EC50为1.73±0.04,野生型EC50为1.59±0.05 atm%,P = 0.01)的耐受性显著更高。野生型和无效等位基因小鼠对其他作用于GABA(A)受体的镇静剂表现出不同反应。给予戊巴比妥和乙醇后睡眠时间无差异,但无效等位基因小鼠对依托咪酯(无效等位基因EC50为17.8±1.9分钟,野生型EC50为26.2±2.4分钟,P<0.02)和咪达唑仑(无效等位基因EC50为14.2±7.8分钟,野生型EC50为41.3±10.4分钟,P<0.05)的耐受性更强。
GABA(A)受体的β3亚基似乎在介导挥发性麻醉剂安氟醚和氟烷引起的制动(夹尾)而非抑制(翻正反射消失)效应中起重要作用。这些数据支持以下假说:麻醉状态的不同组成部分通过不同的中枢神经系统位点介导;GABA(A)受体可能是挥发性麻醉剂制动反应的靶点;β3亚基在介导该反应中起直接或间接作用。缺乏β3亚基似乎减弱了咪达唑仑和依托咪酯的抑制作用,但似乎未改变戊巴比妥、安氟醚和氟烷的抑制作用,提示这些麻醉剂通过不同的特定分子机制产生催眠作用。