Bain G I, Bennett J D, MacDermid J C, Slethaug G P, Richards R S, Roth J H
Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
J Hand Surg Am. 1998 Jan;23(1):76-81. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(98)80093-2.
The intra- and interobserver variability of 3 techniques for measuring the humpback deformity of 37 scaphoids using longitudinal computed tomography was assessed. The 3 measuring techniques were the lateral intrascaphoid angle, the dorsal cortical angle, and the height-to-length ratio. The intraobserver reliability of the intrascaphoid angle was poor; the dorsal cortical angle was moderate to excellent, and the height-to-length ratio was excellent. The interobserver reliability of the intrascaphoid angle was poor to moderate, the dorsal cortical angle was moderate to excellent, and the height-to-length ratio was moderate to excellent. For all 3 observers, the intra- and interobserver reliability was the best for the height-to-length ratio and worst for the intrascaphoid angle. The height-to-length ratio is the most reproducible method of assessing the humpback deformity. Clinical correlation is required to establish whether the height-to-length ratio will be of value in predicting the outcome of fractures of the scaphoid.
评估了使用纵向计算机断层扫描测量37块舟骨驼背畸形的3种技术在观察者内和观察者间的变异性。这3种测量技术分别是舟骨内侧面角、背侧皮质角和高长比。舟骨内侧面角的观察者内可靠性较差;背侧皮质角为中等至优秀,高长比为优秀。舟骨内侧面角的观察者间可靠性为差至中等,背侧皮质角为中等至优秀,高长比为中等至优秀。对于所有3位观察者,观察者内和观察者间可靠性在高长比方面最佳,在舟骨内侧面角方面最差。高长比是评估驼背畸形最可重复的方法。需要进行临床相关性研究以确定高长比在预测舟骨骨折预后方面是否有价值。