• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

功率谱心率分析表明,在低布比卡因脊麻期间交感神经系统的活动降低。

Power spectral heart rate analysis demonstrates decreased activity of the sympathetic nervous system during low bupivacaine spinal anesthesia.

作者信息

Tetzlaff J E, O'Hara J, Yoon H J, Schubert A G

机构信息

Department of General Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 1998 Mar;10(2):133-6. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00253-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00253-5
PMID:9524898
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the onset of spinal anesthesia with power spectral heart rate analysis to determine the influence of the block on the autonomic nervous system.

DESIGN

Prospective, clinical evaluation.

SETTING

Tertiary-care teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

27 ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for lower extremity orthopedic surgery and free of major cardiac disease or cardiac drugs with direct influence of heart rate (HR) or blood pressure (BP).

INTERVENTIONS

Prior to anesthesia, a baseline power spectral heart rate reading was taken in the supine position. Spinal anesthesia was established in the sitting position with 15 mg of bupivacaine and 0.2 mg epinephrine introduced at the L3-L4 interspace with a 22-gauge Quincke needle. The patient was returned supine, and power spectral heart rate data were again collected at 5-minute intervals throughout the procedure. Level of the spinal block was checked at 5-minute intervals until 30 minutes and considered complete when two consecutive readings were unchanged.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Heart rate and BP were recorded at baseline and at five-minute intervals after injection. Power spectral heart rate data included low-frequency activity (LFa), high-frequency activity (HFa), and the ratio (LFa/HFa). Spinal level achieved was recorded by thoracic dermatome at complete onset. Heart rate and BP remained within 20% of control in all cases. Complete onset of the spinal block was present by 30 minutes in all cases. The average level of spinal anesthesia was T8. Compared with baseline, LFa activity decreased, HFa activity remained unchanged, and the ratio was decreased. During endoprosthesis insertion, 9 of 14 total hip patients had a transient ten-fold increase in LFa activity, without HFa change, and a corresponding increase in the ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Power spectral heart rate analysis during low thoracic bupivacaine spinal anesthesia is compatible with decreased sympathetic activity during stable hemodynamic intervals. Insertion of hip endoprosthesis resulted in a dramatic, transient increase in sympathetic activity, indicating that sympathetic activation was still possible despite the presence of surgical anesthesia from the subarachnoid block.

摘要

研究目的

通过功率谱心率分析评估脊髓麻醉的起效情况,以确定该阻滞对自主神经系统的影响。

设计

前瞻性临床评估。

地点

三级护理教学医院。

患者

27例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级和II级的患者,计划进行下肢骨科手术,且无重大心脏疾病或使用对心率(HR)或血压(BP)有直接影响的心脏药物。

干预措施

麻醉前,在仰卧位获取基线功率谱心率读数。患者取坐位,于L3-L4间隙用22号昆克针注入15mg布比卡因和0.2mg肾上腺素建立脊髓麻醉。患者恢复仰卧位,在整个手术过程中每隔5分钟再次收集功率谱心率数据。每隔5分钟检查脊髓阻滞平面,直至30分钟,当连续两次读数不变时视为阻滞完成。

测量指标及主要结果

记录基线及注射后每隔5分钟的心率和血压。功率谱心率数据包括低频活动(LFa)、高频活动(HFa)及比值(LFa/HFa)。脊髓阻滞完全起效时,记录达到的脊髓平面(以胸段皮节表示)。所有病例的心率和血压均保持在对照值的20%以内。所有病例在30分钟时脊髓阻滞均完全起效。脊髓麻醉的平均平面为T8。与基线相比,LFa活动降低,HFa活动不变,比值降低。在全髋关节置换术中,14例全髋关节患者中有9例在植入假体时LFa活动瞬间增加了10倍,HFa无变化,且比值相应增加。

结论

低位胸段布比卡因脊髓麻醉期间的功率谱心率分析与稳定血流动力学期间交感神经活动降低相符。髋关节假体植入导致交感神经活动急剧、短暂增加,表明尽管存在蛛网膜下腔阻滞的手术麻醉,但交感神经仍可能被激活。

相似文献

1
Power spectral heart rate analysis demonstrates decreased activity of the sympathetic nervous system during low bupivacaine spinal anesthesia.功率谱心率分析表明,在低布比卡因脊麻期间交感神经系统的活动降低。
J Clin Anesth. 1998 Mar;10(2):133-6. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00253-5.
2
Heart rate variability and the prone position under general versus spinal anesthesia.全身麻醉与脊髓麻醉下的心率变异性及俯卧位
J Clin Anesth. 1998 Dec;10(8):656-9. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(98)00110-x.
3
Heart rate, heart rate variability, and blood pressure during perioperative stressor events in abdominal surgery.腹部手术围手术期应激事件期间的心率、心率变异性和血压。
J Clin Anesth. 1997 Feb;9(1):52-60. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8180(96)00208-5.
4
Comparison of the effects and complications of unilateral spinal anesthesia versus standard spinal anesthesia in lower-limb orthopedic surgery.单侧脊髓麻醉与标准脊髓麻醉在下肢骨科手术中的效果及并发症比较。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2014 May-Jun;64(3):173-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
5
Influence of baricity on the outcome of spinal anesthesia with bupivacaine for lumbar spine surgery.比重对布比卡因用于腰椎手术脊髓麻醉效果的影响。
Reg Anesth. 1995 Nov-Dec;20(6):533-7.
6
Tourniquet-induced hypertension correlates with autonomic nervous system changes detected by power spectral heart rate analysis.止血带诱导的高血压与通过心率功率谱分析检测到的自主神经系统变化相关。
J Clin Anesth. 1997 Mar;9(2):138-42. doi: 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00238-9.
7
Spread of spinal anesthesia in patients having perianal surgery in the jackknife position: effects of baricity of 0.5% bupivacaine and positioning during and after induction of spinal anesthesia.截石位行肛门周围手术的患者行蛛网膜下腔阻滞麻醉时麻醉扩散:0.5%布比卡因比重和麻醉诱导期间及诱导后体位对麻醉扩散的影响。
J Clin Anesth. 2009 Sep;21(6):408-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.11.008.
8
[The influence of baricity on differential blockade with 0.5% bupivacaine spinal anesthesia].[比重对0.5%布比卡因腰麻中感觉与运动阻滞分离的影响]
Masui. 2001 Sep;50(9):977-85.
9
Unilateral spinal anesthesia using low-flow injection through a 29-gauge Quincke needle.使用29号昆克针通过低流量注射进行单侧脊髓麻醉。
Anesth Analg. 1996 Jun;82(6):1188-91. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199606000-00015.
10
Comparison between Position Change after Low-Dose Spinal Anesthesia and Higher dose with Sitting Position in Elderly Patients: Block Characteristics, Hemodynamic Changes, and Complications.老年患者低剂量与高剂量脊髓麻醉后坐位体位变化的比较:阻滞特征、血流动力学变化及并发症
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Jul-Sep;13(3):476-480. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_101_19.