Takaishi T, Yamamoto T, Ono T, Ito T, Moritani T
Institute of Natural Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998 Mar;30(3):442-9. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199803000-00016.
The purpose of this study was to clarify the reason for the difference in the preferred cadence between cyclists and noncyclists.
Male cyclists and noncyclists were evaluated in terms of pedal force, neuromuscular activity for lower extremities, and oxygen consumption among the cadence manipulation (45, 60, 75, 90, and 105 rpm) during pedaling at 150 and 200 W. Noncyclists having the same levels of aerobic and anaerobic capacity as cyclists were chosen from athletes of different sports to avoid any confounding effect from similar kinetic properties of cyclists for lower extremities (i.e., high speed contraction and high repetitions in prolonged exercise) on both pedaling performance and preferred cadence.
The peak pedal force significantly decreased with increasing of cadence in both groups, and the value for noncyclists was significantly higher than that for cyclists at each cadence despite the same power output. The normalized iEMG for vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles increased in noncyclists with rising cadence; however, cyclists did not show such a significant increase of the normalized iEMG for the muscles. On the other hand, the normalized iEMG for biceps femoris muscle showed a significant increase in cyclists while there was no increase for noncyclists. Oxygen consumption for cyclists was significantly lower than that for noncyclists at 105 rpm for 150 W work and at 75, 90, and 105 rpm for 200 W work.
We conclude that cyclists have a certain pedaling skill regarding the positive utilization for knee flexors up to the higher cadences, which would contribute to a decrease in peak pedal force and which would alleviate muscle activity for the knee extensors. We speculated that pedaling skills that decrease muscle stress influence the preferred cadence selection, contributing to recruitment of ST muscle fibers with fatigue resistance and high mechanical efficiency despite increased oxygen consumption caused by increased repetitions of leg movements.
本研究旨在阐明骑自行车者和非骑自行车者在偏好踏频上存在差异的原因。
在以150瓦和200瓦功率蹬踏过程中,对男性骑自行车者和非骑自行车者进行了踏力、下肢神经肌肉活动以及在踏频操控(45、60、75、90和105转/分钟)期间的耗氧量评估。从不同运动项目的运动员中挑选出有氧和无氧能力与骑自行车者相同的非骑自行车者,以避免骑自行车者下肢类似动力学特性(即长时间运动中的高速收缩和高重复次数)对蹬踏性能和偏好踏频产生任何混杂影响。
两组中,随着踏频增加,峰值踏力均显著降低,尽管功率输出相同,但在每个踏频下,非骑自行车者的峰值踏力值均显著高于骑自行车者。随着踏频升高,非骑自行车者股外侧肌和股内侧肌的标准化肌电图积分值增加;然而,骑自行车者的这些肌肉的标准化肌电图积分值并未出现如此显著的增加。另一方面,骑自行车者股二头肌的标准化肌电图积分值显著增加,而非骑自行车者则没有增加。在150瓦功率下,踏频为105转/分钟时,骑自行车者的耗氧量显著低于非骑自行车者;在200瓦功率下,踏频为75、90和105转/分钟时,骑自行车者的耗氧量也显著低于非骑自行车者。
我们得出结论,骑自行车者在较高踏频下对膝屈肌有积极利用的特定蹬踏技能,这有助于降低峰值踏力,并减轻膝伸肌的肌肉活动。我们推测,降低肌肉压力的蹬踏技能会影响偏好踏频的选择,尽管腿部运动重复次数增加导致耗氧量增加,但有助于募集具有抗疲劳性和高机械效率的慢肌纤维。