Brown G D, Mealey B L, Nummikoski P V, Bifano S L, Waldrop T C
Department of Periodontics, Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ 85707-4405, USA.
J Periodontol. 1998 Feb;69(2):146-57. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.2.146.
A newly developed calcium phosphate cement used to promote bone regeneration in craniofacial defects was examined to determine its potential for treatment of periodontal osseous defects. Sixteen patients with moderate to severe periodontal disease and 2 bilaterally similar vertical bony defects received initial therapy including scaling and root planing followed by treatment with either calcium phosphate cement, flap curettage (F/C) or debridement plus demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA). Standardized radiographs were exposed at baseline and 12 months postsurgery for computer assisted densitometric image analysis (CADIA). The extent of the bony defect was determined during initial and 12 month re-entry surgery. Within 6 months of implant placement, 11 of 16 patients treated with calcium phosphate cement exfoliated all or most of the implant through the gingival sulcus. At all 16 test sites, a narrow radiolucent gap formed by 1 month postsurgery at the initially tight visual interface between the radiopaque calcium phosphate cement and the walls of the bony defect. Mean probing depth reduction and clinical attachment gain at sites treated with calcium phosphate cement were 1.6 mm and 1.3 mm, respectively at 1 year. Minimal bony defect fill was accompanied by mean crestal resorption of 1.4 mm. Alveolar crestal resorption at sites with calcium phosphate cement was statistically significant (P=0.001). These findings contrasted with the more favorable outcomes for controls treated with DFDBA or F/C. DFDBA sites exhibited probing depth reduction of 3.1 mm, clinical attachment gain of 2.9 mm, and defect fill of 2.4 mm. Respective clinical changes at F/C sites were 2.4 mm, 1.4 mm, and 1.1 mm. CADIA revealed clinically significant trends between the three treatment modalities at various areas-of-interest. Based on the findings of this study, there is no rationale available to support the use of hydroxyapatite cement implant in its current formulation for the treatment of vertical intrabony periodontal defects.
一种新开发的用于促进颅面缺损骨再生的磷酸钙骨水泥,被用于评估其治疗牙周骨缺损的潜力。16例中度至重度牙周病患者和2例双侧类似垂直骨缺损患者接受了初始治疗,包括洁治和根面平整,随后分别接受磷酸钙骨水泥、翻瓣刮治术(F/C)或清创加脱矿冻干骨移植(DFDBA)治疗。在基线和术后12个月拍摄标准化X线片,用于计算机辅助密度测量图像分析(CADIA)。在初次手术和12个月再次手术时确定骨缺损的范围。在植入后6个月内,16例接受磷酸钙骨水泥治疗的患者中有11例的种植体全部或大部分通过牙龈沟脱落。在所有16个测试部位,术后1个月在不透射线的磷酸钙骨水泥与骨缺损壁之间最初紧密的视觉界面处形成了一条狭窄的透射间隙。在接受磷酸钙骨水泥治疗的部位,1年时平均探诊深度减少和临床附着增加分别为1.6mm和1.3mm。骨缺损填充极少,同时平均嵴顶吸收为1.4mm。磷酸钙骨水泥部位的牙槽嵴吸收具有统计学意义(P=0.001)。这些结果与接受DFDBA或F/C治疗的对照组更有利的结果形成对比。DFDBA部位探诊深度减少3.1mm,临床附着增加2.9mm,缺损填充2.4mm。F/C部位相应的临床变化分别为2.4mm、1.4mm和1.1mm。CADIA显示,在不同感兴趣区域,三种治疗方式之间存在具有临床意义的趋势。基于本研究的结果,目前没有理由支持使用当前配方的羟基磷灰石骨水泥植入物来治疗垂直骨内牙周缺损。