• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对从不同土壤中分离出的细菌进行DNA探测,以寻找编码反硝化作用、固氮作用和硝化作用的基因。

DNA-probing for genes coding for denitrification, N2-fixation and nitrification in bacteria isolated from different soils.

作者信息

Kloos K, Hüsgen U M, Bothe H

机构信息

Botanisches Institut, Universität zu Köln, Germany.

出版信息

Z Naturforsch C J Biosci. 1998 Jan-Feb;53(1-2):69-81. doi: 10.1515/znc-1998-1-214.

DOI:10.1515/znc-1998-1-214
PMID:9528124
Abstract

Bacteria isolated from different layers of four soils of the Cologne area were analyzed for denitrifying, nitrifying and N2-fixing isolates by colony hybridization using gene probes. In the soils tested, the percentage of denitrifying bacteria among the total population isolated was 3-8% (in one case exceptionally 15%) and thus small. Denitrifying bacteria were particularly enriched in the upper layer (depth approximately 5 cm) and were present only in low amounts at 25 cm depth in two gleysol soils. Nitrate apparently did not determine the distribution of denitrifying bacteria in these soils. The potential denitrification activity of different soil layers coincided with the distribution pattern of isolates assessed by DNA-probing. The total number of bacteria and of denitrifying isolates was considerably higher in or at the roots of plants than in the bulk, root-free soil adjacent to the plants. The percentage of the isolated aerobic N2-fixing bacteria varied between 0-3%, and these bacteria could be isolated mainly from the upper 5 cm layer. A small portion of the isolates hybridized with the probe coding for part of one subunit of ammonia monooxygenase from Nitrosomonas europaea. The investigation showed that DNA-probing can provide useful information about the relative distribution of denitrifying and N2-fixing bacteria in different soils and their layers.

摘要

通过使用基因探针进行菌落杂交,对从科隆地区四种土壤的不同土层中分离出的细菌进行了反硝化、硝化和固氮菌株分析。在所测试的土壤中,分离出的细菌总数中反硝化细菌的比例为3%-8%(在一个案例中异常地达到了15%),因此比例较小。反硝化细菌在上层(深度约5厘米)特别富集,在两种潜育土中,25厘米深度处的反硝化细菌数量仅处于低水平。硝酸盐显然并未决定这些土壤中反硝化细菌的分布。不同土壤层的潜在反硝化活性与通过DNA探测评估的菌株分布模式一致。植物根系内或根系处的细菌总数和反硝化菌株总数显著高于植物附近无根系的大块土壤。分离出的好氧固氮细菌的比例在0%-3%之间,这些细菌主要可从上层5厘米土层中分离得到。一小部分分离菌株与编码欧洲亚硝化单胞菌氨单加氧酶一个亚基部分的探针杂交。该研究表明,DNA探测可为不同土壤及其土层中反硝化细菌和固氮细菌的相对分布提供有用信息。

相似文献

1
DNA-probing for genes coding for denitrification, N2-fixation and nitrification in bacteria isolated from different soils.对从不同土壤中分离出的细菌进行DNA探测,以寻找编码反硝化作用、固氮作用和硝化作用的基因。
Z Naturforsch C J Biosci. 1998 Jan-Feb;53(1-2):69-81. doi: 10.1515/znc-1998-1-214.
2
Relative abundance of denitrifying and dinitrogen-fixing bacteria in layers of a forest soil.森林土壤各层中反硝化细菌和固氮细菌的相对丰度
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2001 Jun;36(1):33-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00823.x.
3
Effects of management regime and plant species on the enzyme activity and genetic structure of N-fixing, denitrifying and nitrifying bacterial communities in grassland soils.管理方式和植物物种对草地土壤中固氮、反硝化和硝化细菌群落的酶活性及遗传结构的影响。
Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jun;8(6):1005-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.00992.x.
4
Nitrogen removal and nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria quantification in a stormwater bioretention system.雨水生物滞留系统中的氮去除和硝化及反硝化细菌定量。
Water Res. 2013 Mar 15;47(4):1691-700. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.12.033. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
5
Improved assessment of denitrifying, N2-fixing, and total-community bacteria by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis using multiple restriction enzymes.通过使用多种限制酶的末端限制性片段长度多态性分析改进对反硝化细菌、固氮细菌和总群落细菌的评估。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Apr;71(4):2026-35. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.4.2026-2035.2005.
6
Studies on salinization in Haryana soils on free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial populations and their activity.哈里亚纳邦土壤盐渍化对自生固氮菌种群及其活性的影响研究。
J Basic Microbiol. 2014 Mar;54(3):170-9. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201200158. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
7
Environmental variables better explain changes in potential nitrification and denitrification activities than microbial properties in fertilized forest soils.环境变量比施肥林地土壤中的微生物特性更能解释潜在硝化和反硝化活性的变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jan 10;647:653-662. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.437. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
8
Nitrifier-induced denitrification is an important source of soil nitrous oxide and can be inhibited by a nitrification inhibitor 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate.硝化作用诱导的反硝化作用是土壤一氧化二氮的重要来源,并且可以被硝化抑制剂3,4-二甲基吡唑磷酸盐抑制。
Environ Microbiol. 2017 Dec;19(12):4851-4865. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13872. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
9
[Effects of different fertilization regimes on abundance and community structure of the nirK-type denitrifying bacteria in greenhouse vegetable soils].不同施肥制度对温室蔬菜土壤中nirK型反硝化细菌丰度和群落结构的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2014 Feb;25(2):505-14.
10
Symbiotic N-Fixer Community Composition, but Not Diversity, Shifts in Nodules of a Single Host Legume Across a 2-Million-Year Dune Chronosequence.共生固氮菌群落组成而非多样性在一个宿主豆科植物的根瘤中随 200 万年沙丘时间序列变化。
Microb Ecol. 2018 Nov;76(4):1009-1020. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1185-1. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Soil microbial community response to drought and precipitation variability in the Chihuahuan Desert.奇瓦瓦沙漠土壤微生物群落对干旱和降水变异性的响应。
Microb Ecol. 2009 Feb;57(2):248-60. doi: 10.1007/s00248-008-9475-7. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
2
Changes of diversity pattern of proteolytic bacteria over time and space in an agricultural soil.农业土壤中蛋白水解细菌多样性模式随时间和空间的变化
Microb Ecol. 2009 Apr;57(3):391-401. doi: 10.1007/s00248-008-9416-5. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
3
Biodiversity of denitrifying and dinitrogen-fixing bacteria in an acid forest soil.
酸性森林土壤中反硝化细菌和固氮细菌的生物多样性
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Aug;68(8):3818-29. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.8.3818-3829.2002.
4
Comparison of soil bacterial communities in rhizospheres of three plant species and the interspaces in an arid grassland.干旱草原中三种植物根际土壤细菌群落与间隙土壤细菌群落的比较
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Apr;68(4):1854-63. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.4.1854-1863.2002.