Espinosa-Huerta E, Robles-Páramo A, Viniegra-Velázquez L
Jefatura de Educación e Investigación Médica, Hospital General C.M. La Raza IMSS, México, D.F.
Rev Invest Clin. 1997 Nov-Dec;49(6):469-74.
To explore ability to read clinical research papers by pediatric residents at different stages of their training.
Four hospitals of the Mexican Social Security System located in Mexico City.
An instrument to evaluate the ability to read critically pediatric research papers was developed and validated by four experts. It contained four abstracts generated from research articles and was integrated by 30 interpretation items, 30 judgment items and 30 alternative proposals items, to be answered by the true-false- don't know system.
Sixty seven residents participated (21 first year, 20 second year and 26 third year level). There were no significant differences in interpretation, judgment and overall scores between groups. There was a significant degree of agreement in the ordinality of the residents for the scores in interpretation, judgment and proposals (Kendall W = 0.55, p < 0.001).
We conclude that the residents were not influenced by the training received during their residence in regard to their ability for critical reading of clinical research papers.
探讨不同培训阶段的儿科住院医师阅读临床研究论文的能力。
位于墨西哥城的墨西哥社会保障系统的四家医院。
由四位专家开发并验证了一种评估批判性阅读儿科研究论文能力的工具。它包含从研究文章中生成的四篇摘要，并由30个解释项目、30个判断项目和30个替代建议项目组成，通过“是/否/不知道”系统进行回答。
67名住院医师参与（21名第一年、20名第二年和26名第三年水平）。各组在解释、判断和总分方面无显著差异。住院医师在解释、判断和建议得分的排序上有显著程度的一致性（肯德尔W = 0.55，p < 0.001）。
我们得出结论，住院医师在批判性阅读临床研究论文的能力方面不受其住院期间所接受培训的影响。
