• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Clinical teaching rounds. A case-oriented faculty development program.

作者信息

Lye P S, Simpson D E, Wendelberger K J, Bragg D S

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 Mar;152(3):293-5. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.3.293.

DOI:10.1001/archpedi.152.3.293
PMID:9529470
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To improve clinical teaching with emphasis on improving provision of feedback through a faculty development series modeled on clinical rounds.

METHOD

Seven 1-hour conferences were held for the pediatric faculty during the academic year 1994-1995. Clinical rounds were emulated, with a simulated learner functioning as the patient with a chief complaint of some instructional problem. The conferences progressed from discussion about teaching in a particular situation, to videotapes of clinical teaching, and finally to live clinical teaching. Evaluation of the conferences was assessed by attendance records, participants' evaluations of the conferences, and comparing student and resident evaluations of faculty who attended (i.e., those who attended > or = 2) with faculty who did not attend. Comparisons were made for the academic year before and after the conferences using paired t tests.

RESULTS

Forty percent of the faculty attended 2 or more conferences. Mean conference ratings were 4.00 to 4.35, (1 is poor; 5, excellent). Faculty who attended had a significant improvement in ratings for feedback (P = .01) and overall teaching effectiveness (P = .04). Ratings for faculty who did not attend did not change.

CONCLUSION

These conferences were well received by the faculty and are an effective way to improve clinical teaching.

摘要

相似文献

1
Clinical teaching rounds. A case-oriented faculty development program.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 Mar;152(3):293-5. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.3.293.
2
Improving teaching on an inpatient pediatrics service: a retrospective analysis of a program change.改善住院儿科服务的教学:对项目变更的回顾性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Oct 1;12:92. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-92.
3
Effect of a teaching skills program on faculty skills and confidence.教学技能培训项目对教师技能和信心的影响。
Ambul Pediatr. 2004 Jan-Feb;4(1 Suppl):117-20. doi: 10.1367/1539-4409(2004)004<0117:eoatsp>2.0.co;2.
4
Relationship between systematic feedback to faculty and ratings of clinical teaching.
Acad Med. 1996 Oct;71(10):1100-2. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199610000-00019.
5
Recognizing clinical faculty's contributions in education.认可临床教员在教育方面的贡献。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):940-1. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00047.
6
Peer Observation of Rounds Leads to Collegial Discussion of Teaching.同行查房观察引发教学方面的同行讨论。
Teach Learn Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;30(2):233-238. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1360185. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
7
Ongoing faculty evaluations: developmental gain or just more pain?持续的教师评估:是发展进步还是徒增痛苦?
Curr Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb;63(1):80-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cursur.2005.08.010.
8
The impact of the Stanford Faculty Development Program on ambulatory teaching behavior.斯坦福大学教师发展项目对门诊教学行为的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 May;21(5):430-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00422.x.
9
Third-year medical students' evaluation of hospitalist and nonhospitalist faculty during the inpatient portion of their pediatrics clerkships.三年级医学生在儿科实习住院期间对住院医师和非住院医师教员的评价。
J Hosp Med. 2007 Jan;2(1):17-22. doi: 10.1002/jhm.145.
10
A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8.旨在提高医学教育教学效果的教师发展举措的系统评价:BEME指南第8号
Med Teach. 2006 Sep;28(6):497-526. doi: 10.1080/01421590600902976.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of faculty development programs based on the Harden teacher's role framework model.基于哈顿教师角色框架模型的教师发展项目系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 30;23(1):910. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04863-4.
2
Faculty Development on Clinical Teaching Skills: An Effective Model for the Busy Clinician.临床教学技能的教师发展:忙碌临床医生的有效模式
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2016 Jan 4;3. doi: 10.4137/JMECD.S40798. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.