Podolin D A, Gayles E C, Wei Y, Thresher J S, Pagliassotti M J
Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262, USA.
Am J Physiol. 1998 Mar;274(3):R840-8. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1998.274.3.R840.
Although fish oil supplementation may prevent the onset of diet-induced insulin resistance in rats, it appears to worsen glycemic control in humans with existing insulin resistance. In the present study, the euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic (4x basal) clamp technique with [3-3H]glucose and 2-deoxy-[1-14C]glucose was used to directly compare the ability of fish oil to prevent and reverse sucrose-induced insulin resistance. In study 1 (prevention study), male Wistar rats were fed a purified high-starch diet (68% of total energy), high-sucrose diet (68% of total energy), or high-sucrose diet in which 6% of the fat content was replaced by menhaden oil for 5 wk. In study 2 (reversal study), animals were fed the high-starch or high-sucrose diets for 5 wk and then the sucrose animals were assigned to one of the following groups for an additional 5 wk: high starch, high sucrose, or high sucrose with 6% menhaden oil. Rats fed the high-starch diet for 10 wk served as controls. In study 3 (2nd reversal study), animals followed a similar diet protocol as in study 2; however, the reversal period was extended to 15 wk. In study 1, the presence of the fish oil in the high-sucrose diet prevented the development of insulin resistance. Glucose infusion rates (GIR, mg.kg-1.min-1) were 17.0 +/- 0.9 in starch, 10.6 +/- 1.7 in sucrose, and 15.1 +/- 1.5 in sucrose with fish oil animals. However, in study 2, this same diet was unable to reverse sucrose-induced insulin resistance (GIR, 16.7 +/- 1.4 in starch, 7.1 +/- 1.5 in sucrose, and 4.8 +/- 0.9 in sucrose with fish oil animals). Sucrose-induced insulin resistance was reversed in rats that were switched back to the starch diet (GIR, 18.6 +/- 3.0). Results from study 3 were similar to those observed in study 2. In summary, fish oil was effective in preventing diet-induced insulin resistance but not able to reverse it. A preexisting insulin-resistant environment interferes with the positive effects of menhaden oil on insulin action.
尽管补充鱼油可能会预防大鼠因饮食诱导的胰岛素抵抗的发生,但对于已有胰岛素抵抗的人类而言,它似乎会使血糖控制恶化。在本研究中,采用了用[3-3H]葡萄糖和2-脱氧-[1-14C]葡萄糖进行的正常血糖、高胰岛素血症(4倍基础水平)钳夹技术,以直接比较鱼油预防和逆转蔗糖诱导的胰岛素抵抗的能力。在研究1(预防研究)中,雄性Wistar大鼠被喂食纯化的高淀粉饮食(占总能量的68%)、高蔗糖饮食(占总能量的68%)或高蔗糖饮食,其中6%的脂肪含量被鲱鱼油替代,持续5周。在研究2(逆转研究)中,动物先被喂食高淀粉或高蔗糖饮食5周,然后将蔗糖组动物分为以下几组再持续5周:高淀粉组、高蔗糖组或含6%鲱鱼油的高蔗糖组。喂食高淀粉饮食10周的大鼠作为对照组。在研究3(第二次逆转研究)中,动物遵循与研究2相似的饮食方案;然而,逆转期延长至15周。在研究1中,高蔗糖饮食中鱼油的存在预防了胰岛素抵抗的发展。淀粉组的葡萄糖输注率(GIR,mg·kg-1·min-1)为17.0±0.9,蔗糖组为10.6±1.7,含鱼油的蔗糖组为15.1±1.5。然而,在研究2中,同样的饮食无法逆转蔗糖诱导的胰岛素抵抗(GIR,淀粉组为16.7±1.4,蔗糖组为7.1±1.5,含鱼油的蔗糖组为4.8±0.9)。换回淀粉饮食的大鼠中蔗糖诱导的胰岛素抵抗得到了逆转(GIR,18.6±3.0)。研究3的结果与研究2中观察到的结果相似。总之,鱼油在预防饮食诱导的胰岛素抵抗方面有效,但无法逆转它。预先存在的胰岛素抵抗环境会干扰鲱鱼油对胰岛素作用的积极影响。