Suppr超能文献

羟基脲单药与羟基脲联合低剂量α-干扰素-2b治疗慢性粒细胞白血病的随机研究。比荷卢慢性粒细胞白血病研究组。

Randomized study on hydroxyurea alone versus hydroxyurea combined with low-dose interferon-alpha 2b for chronic myeloid leukemia. The Benelux CML Study Group.

出版信息

Blood. 1998 Apr 15;91(8):2713-21.

PMID:9531580
Abstract

Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) is considered the standard therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients not suitable for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. From 1987 through 1992, 195 patients in the Benelux with recent untreated CML were randomized between low-dose IFN-alpha2b (3 MIU, 5 days/wk) or hydroxyurea alone (control group). The white blood cell count had to be kept less than 10 x 10(9)/L in both arms; to this end, the IFN group received additional hydroxyurea, if necessary. The complete hematologic responses at 6 months in the IFN group were 62%, versus 38% in the control group. In the IFN group, a complete hematologic response at 6 months predicted a better survival (P = .001), but such a tendency was also seen in the control group (P = .07). Cytogenetic responses in the IFN group yielded 9% complete responders, 7% partial responders (<35% Ph+), and 24% minor responders (36% to 95% Ph+). The quality of cytogenetic response within the first 24 months was highly predictive for survival (P = .002). Twenty-four patients discontinued IFN-alpha because of side effects, but they did this at a long median interval of 17.6 months; the remaining patients did not require dose adaptations. Although the hematologic and cytogenetic responses in the IFN group were higher than in the control group, the duration of chronic phase from randomization was not statistically different with 53 and 44 months in the IFN and control group, respectively. Also, no advantage for survival calculated from diagnosis was seen for the IFN group (median, 64 months) compared with the control group (median, 68 months).

摘要

α干扰素(IFN-α)被认为是不适合同基因干细胞移植的慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者的标准疗法。1987年至1992年期间,比荷卢经济联盟的195例近期未接受治疗的CML患者被随机分为低剂量IFN-α2b(3百万国际单位,每周5天)组或单独使用羟基脲组(对照组)。两组的白细胞计数均须维持在低于10×10⁹/L;为此,必要时IFN组会加用羟基脲。IFN组6个月时的完全血液学缓解率为62%,而对照组为38%。在IFN组,6个月时的完全血液学缓解预示着更好的生存率(P = 0.001),但在对照组也观察到了这种趋势(P = 0.07)。IFN组的细胞遗传学缓解情况为9%完全缓解、7%部分缓解(Ph⁺<35%)以及24%微小缓解(Ph⁺ 36%至95%)。最初24个月内细胞遗传学缓解的质量对生存率具有高度预测性(P = 0.002)。24例患者因副作用停用IFN-α,但他们停药的中位间隔时间较长,为17.6个月;其余患者无需调整剂量。尽管IFN组的血液学和细胞遗传学缓解率高于对照组,但从随机分组开始计算的慢性期持续时间在IFN组和对照组分别为53个月和44个月,并无统计学差异。此外,与对照组(中位生存期68个月)相比,IFN组从诊断开始计算的生存率也无优势(中位生存期64个月)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验