• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗渐进性护理患者的药学服务

Pharmaceutical care in medical progressive care patients.

作者信息

Smythe M A, Shah P P, Spiteri T L, Lucarotti R L, Begle R L

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Services, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 1998 Mar;32(3):294-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.17068.

DOI:10.1345/aph.17068
PMID:9533058
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop, implement, and assess the outcomes of a system for providing pharmaceutical care to medical progressive care patients.

METHODS

A system for providing pharmaceutical care was developed and implemented for an 8-week period beginning in June 1995. Both patient care outcomes and drug therapy cost change from the intervention period were compared with those of an 8-week baseline period. Variables compared included unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, transfers to the intensive care unit, readmissions, and adverse drug reactions requiring treatment. Differences between periods for these variables were assessed by using chi 2 tests and t-tests with alpha set at p less than 0.05. The clinical significance of the interventions were assessed independently by four physicians: two intensivists and two internists. The total drug therapy cost change from the intervention period was calculated as follows: total cost avoidance from individual recommendations subtracted from the total cost incurred from individual recommendations.

RESULTS

The pharmacist evaluated 152 patients during the intervention period. A total of 235 pharmacotherapy recommendations were made on 103 patients, of whom 86.4% were accepted. Significantly fewer adverse drug reactions (ADRs) received treatment during the intervention period (p = 0.027). The mean unit length of stay was lower during the intervention period (4.8 +/- 3.7 d) than during the baseline period (6.0 +/- 5.6 d); however, this difference was not significant (p = 0.053). Individual physician assessment of the pharmacists' recommendations revealed that 75.8% were considered somewhat significant, significant, or very significant. The total drug therapy cost change from the intervention period was -$6534.53. The projected annual drug therapy cost reduction from this study is $42,474.45.

CONCLUSIONS

The provision of pharmaceutical care to medical progressive care patients was associated with a substantial decrease in drug therapy cost and a decrease in the number of ADRs that required treatment.

摘要

目的

开发、实施并评估为内科重症监护患者提供药学服务的系统效果。

方法

1995年6月起,开发并实施了一个为期8周的药学服务提供系统。将干预期间的患者护理结果和药物治疗成本变化与8周基线期进行比较。比较的变量包括住院单元时长、住院总时长、转入重症监护病房情况、再入院情况以及需要治疗的药物不良反应。通过卡方检验和t检验评估这些变量在不同时期的差异,设定α为p<0.05。由四位医生(两位重症医学专家和两位内科医生)独立评估干预措施的临床意义。干预期间药物治疗总成本变化计算如下:从个体建议产生的总成本中减去个体建议避免的总成本。

结果

干预期间药师评估了152例患者。共对103例患者提出235条药物治疗建议,其中86.4%被采纳。干预期间接受治疗的药物不良反应(ADR)明显减少(p = 0.027)。干预期间平均住院单元时长(4.8±3.7天)低于基线期(6.0±5.6天);然而,这种差异不显著(p = 0.053)。医生对药师建议的个体评估显示,75.8%的建议被认为具有一定意义、显著意义或非常显著意义。干预期间药物治疗总成本变化为 -6534.53美元。本研究预计每年可减少药物治疗成本42474.45美元。

结论

为内科重症监护患者提供药学服务与药物治疗成本大幅降低以及需要治疗的ADR数量减少相关。

相似文献

1
Pharmaceutical care in medical progressive care patients.医疗渐进性护理患者的药学服务
Ann Pharmacother. 1998 Mar;32(3):294-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.17068.
2
Effectiveness of pharmaceutical care in an intensive care unit from China. A pre- and post-intervention study.中国某重症监护病房药学服务的有效性:一项干预前后研究。
Saudi Med J. 2012 Jul;33(7):756-62.
3
Effects of pharmaceutical care on medication cost and quality of patient care in an ambulatory-care clinic.药学服务对门诊诊所药物治疗费用及患者护理质量的影响。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992 Jul;49(7):1681-8.
4
Effect of a pharmacist's and a nurse's interventions on cost of drug therapy in a medical intensive-care unit.药师和护士干预对内科重症监护病房药物治疗费用的影响。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1989 Jun;46(6):1179-82.
5
Focus and impact of pharmacists' interventions.药剂师干预措施的重点与影响。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 1993 Jun;46(3):101-8.
6
Effectiveness of an ambulatory care clinical pharmacist: a controlled trial.门诊护理临床药剂师的有效性:一项对照试验。
Ann Pharmacother. 1993 May;27(5):555-9. doi: 10.1177/106002809302700503.
7
Effect of pharmacist interventions on drug therapy costs in a surgical intensive-care unit.药剂师干预对外科重症监护病房药物治疗费用的影响。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986 Dec;43(12):3008-13.
8
Improving antimicrobial dosing in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration and the effect of pharmacist dosing adjustment.改善接受连续静脉-静脉血液滤过的危重症患者的抗菌药物剂量及药师调整剂量的效果。
Eur J Intern Med. 2014 Dec;25(10):930-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
9
Quality improvement and cost savings after implementation of the Leapfrog intensive care unit physician staffing standard at a community teaching hospital.在社区教学医院实施 Leapfrog 重症监护病房医师人员配备标准后的质量改进和成本节约。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2754-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825b26ef.
10
Economic evaluation of a nursing-led inpatient unit: the impact of findings on management decisions of service utility and sustainability.由护士主导的住院病房的经济评估:研究结果对服务效用和可持续性管理决策的影响。
J Nurs Manag. 2005 Sep;13(5):428-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2005.00589.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect and associated factors of a clinical pharmacy model in the incidence of medication errors in the hospital Pablo Tobón Uribe eacpharmodel study: stepped wedge randomized controlled Trial (NCT03338725).临床药学模式对医院用药错误发生率的影响及相关因素: stepped wedge 随机对照试验(NCT03338725)
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Apr;44(2):439-447. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01361-9. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
2
Impact of a Unit-Based Clinical Pharmacist on Communication of Medication Information in an Orthopedic Hospital.基于科室的临床药师对骨科医院用药信息沟通的影响。
HSS J. 2020 Dec;16(Suppl 2):333-338. doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09739-2. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
3
Investigating the Relative Significance of Drug-Related Problem Categories.
探究药物相关问题类别的相对重要性。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2017 Jun 9;5(2):31. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy5020031.
4
Impact of clinical pharmacist in an Indian Intensive Care Unit.临床药师在印度重症监护病房的影响。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;20(2):78-83. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.175931.
5
Tools for Assessing Potential Significance of Pharmacist Interventions: A Systematic Review.评估药剂师干预潜在重要性的工具:一项系统综述。
Drug Saf. 2016 Feb;39(2):131-46. doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0370-0.
6
Clinical pharmacists on medical care of pediatric inpatients: a single-center randomized controlled trial.临床药师参与儿科住院患儿医疗服务的效果:一项单中心随机对照试验
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30856. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030856. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
7
Cost-effectiveness of ward-based pharmacy care in surgical patients: protocol of the SUREPILL (Surgery & Pharmacy In Liaison) study.基于病房的外科患者药学服务的成本效益研究:SUREPILL(外科与药学联络)研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Mar 7;11:55. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-55.
8
International critical care hospital pharmacist activities.国际重症监护医院药剂师的活动。
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Mar;34(3):538-42. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0918-2. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
9
Characteristics of drug-related problems discussed by hospital pharmacists in multidisciplinary teams.医院药剂师在多学科团队中讨论的药物相关问题的特征。
Pharm World Sci. 2006 Jun;28(3):152-8. doi: 10.1007/s11096-006-9020-z. Epub 2006 Sep 27.