Ackerman M B
University of Pennsylvania School of Dental Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997 Nov;18(11):1131-8, 1140; quiz 1142.
The full coverage restoration (FCR) and its effect on the periodontium have been the subject of much controversy over the last half century. The conflict relates to whether the margin of the FCR should be placed at or above the gingival crest, or into the gingival crevice. Clinicians and researchers alike have focused their attention primarily on the mechanistic aspects of fixed prosthetic design (i.e., marginal configuration and fit). Although marginal quality and form are factors in the fabrication of the FCR, they alone will not determine periodontal health and restorative success. What determines the success of the FCR is its ability to restore form and function to the masticatory system without adversely affecting its biology. Each technical phase of treatment (i.e., tooth preparation, impression-taking, the provisional restoration, and the final restoration) must be performed within the limits of biologic adaptation. This literature review discusses the scientific evidence regarding FCR margin placement and periodontal health.