Hamada T, Watanabe M, Kaneda T, Ohtahara A, Kinugawa T, Hisatome I, Fujimoto Y, Yoshida A, Shigemasa C
First Department of Internal Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Japan.
J Hypertens. 1998 Jan;16(1):111-8. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199816010-00016.
To compare the effects of amlodipine and nifedipine on heart rate and parameters of sympathetic nerve activity during the acute and chronic treatment periods in order to elucidate their influence on cardiovascular outcome.
A randomized and single-blind study.
We performed 24 h ambulatory electrocardiography and blood pressure monitoring of 45 essential hypertensive inpatients. Plasma and urinary catecholamine levels were measured during the control (pretreatment) period, on the first day (acute period) and after 4 weeks (chronic period) of administration of amlodipine and of short-acting nifedipine or its slow-releasing formulation. The low-frequency and high-frequency power spectral densities and low-frequency: high-frequency ratio were obtained by heart rate power spectral analysis.
Blood pressure was significantly and similarly reduced by administrations of amlodipine, short-acting nifedipine and slow-releasing nifedipine during the chronic period. The total QRS count per 24 h, which remained constant during the chronic period of administration of slow-releasing nifedipine and was increased by administration of nifedipine, was decreased by 2.8% by administration of amlodipine. Administration of amlodipine decreased the plasma and urinary norepinephrine levels during the chronic period, whereas the levels were significantly increased by administration of short-acting nifedipine and not changed by administration of slow-release nifedipine. Although low-frequency: high-frequency ratio was increased significantly by administration of short-acting nifedipine and slightly by administration of slow-releasing nifedipine, administration of amlodipine reduced it during the acute and chronic periods.
Administration of amlodipine did not induce an increase in sympathetic nerve activity in essential hypertensive patients during the chronic period, suggesting that beneficial effects on essential hypertension can be expected after its long-term administration. Administration of slow-releasing nifedipine induces milder reflex sympathetic activation than does that of short-acting nifedipine.
比较氨氯地平和硝苯地平在急性和慢性治疗期对心率及交感神经活动参数的影响,以阐明它们对心血管结局的影响。
一项随机单盲研究。
对45例原发性高血压住院患者进行24小时动态心电图和血压监测。在对照(治疗前)期、服用氨氯地平和短效硝苯地平或其缓释制剂的第一天(急性期)和4周后(慢性期)测量血浆和尿儿茶酚胺水平。通过心率功率谱分析获得低频和高频功率谱密度以及低频:高频比值。
在慢性期,氨氯地平、短效硝苯地平和缓释硝苯地平均可显著且相似地降低血压。每24小时的总QRS计数在缓释硝苯地平慢性给药期保持不变,硝苯地平给药使其增加,而氨氯地平给药使其降低2.8%。氨氯地平给药在慢性期降低了血浆和尿去甲肾上腺素水平,而短效硝苯地平给药使其显著升高,缓释硝苯地平给药则未使其改变。虽然短效硝苯地平给药显著增加了低频:高频比值,缓释硝苯地平给药使其略有增加,但氨氯地平给药在急性期和慢性期均使其降低。
在慢性期,氨氯地平给药未引起原发性高血压患者交感神经活动增加,提示长期给药后对原发性高血压可能有有益作用。与短效硝苯地平相比,缓释硝苯地平引起的反射性交感神经激活较轻。