Livesley W J
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Can J Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;43(2):137-47. doi: 10.1177/070674379804300202.
The classification of personality disorder is one of the least satisfactory sections of contemporary psychiatric classification. Fundamental problems with current classifications include extensive diagnostic overlap, limited evidence of validity, and poor empirical support.
Conceptual analysis and the results of empirical studies are used to propose a framework for organizing an empirically based classification.
First, personality disorder is a form of mental disorder and, therefore, should be classified as a single diagnostic entity on Axis I along with other mental disorders. A preliminary definition of personality disorder as a tripartite failure involving the self system, kinship relationships, and societal relationships is proposed. The evidence suggests that this definition can be translated into a reliable set of items. Second, the diagnosis of personality disorder should be separated from the assessment of clinically relevant personality traits. Given the consistent evidential support for a dimensional model of personality disorder, it is suggested that personality be coded on a set of trait dimensions selected to provide a systematic representation of the domain of behaviours represented by current diagnostic concepts. Third, given that personality traits are hierarchically organized, it is suggested that an axis for coding personality include basic or lower-order dimensions as the primary level of assessment and a few higher-order patterns to summarize information for some purposes.
A preliminary list of 16 basic dispositional traits is proposed to describe the more specific components of personality disorder based, in part, on the convergence of evidence across studies: anxiousness, affective lability, callousness, cognitive dysregulation, compulsivity, conduct problems, insecure attachment, intimacy avoidance, narcissism, oppositionality, rejection, restricted expression, social avoidance, stimulus seeking, submissiveness, and suspiciousness. Three higher-order patterns were proposed: emotional dysregulation, dissocial behaviour, and inhibitedness, which may occur independently or in combination.
人格障碍的分类是当代精神科分类中最不尽人意的部分之一。当前分类的基本问题包括广泛的诊断重叠、有效性证据有限以及实证支持不足。
运用概念分析和实证研究结果,提出一个基于实证的分类组织框架。
首先,人格障碍是精神障碍的一种形式,因此应与其他精神障碍一起在轴I上被分类为单一诊断实体。提出了人格障碍的初步定义,即涉及自我系统、亲属关系和社会关系的三方功能失调。有证据表明,这个定义可以转化为一组可靠的项目。其次,人格障碍的诊断应与临床相关人格特质的评估分开。鉴于对人格障碍维度模型的一致证据支持,建议在一组特质维度上对人格进行编码,这些维度的选择是为了系统地呈现当前诊断概念所代表的行为领域。第三,鉴于人格特质是层次组织的,建议用于编码人格的一个轴包括基本或低阶维度作为主要评估水平,以及一些高阶模式,以便在某些情况下总结信息。
基于部分研究证据的趋同,提出了16种基本性情特质的初步清单,以描述人格障碍更具体的组成部分:焦虑、情感不稳定、冷酷、认知失调、强迫性、行为问题、不安全依恋、亲密回避、自恋、对立性、拒绝、表达受限、社交回避、刺激寻求、顺从和猜疑。提出了三种高阶模式:情绪失调、反社会行为和抑制,它们可能单独出现或同时出现。