Stewart E, Weinstein R S
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 61820, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 1997 Dec;25(6):809-37. doi: 10.1023/a:1022265213167.
Employed quantitative and qualitative data in a contextual examination of participation in three San Francisco-area HIV/AIDS organizations: an urban, gay community-based social change setting; an urban, broadly focused information/referral setting; and a suburban individual support setting. The settings attracted different kinds of volunteers and engaged them differently with the setting, each other, and community. In quantitative analyses external political efficacy (belief in the responsiveness of sociopolitical systems to change efforts) significantly distinguished settings, but was best predicted by setting-moderated relationships to scaled motivations. Qualitative data more clearly illuminated volunteers' motivations for participation, as well as complex, embedded relationships between setting, motivations, attitudes about sociopolitical participation, and personal and community experience and identification. Together the findings underscore three unique but related stories for the three AIDS organizations, and the value of contextual approaches to participation and empowerment.
在对旧金山地区三个艾滋病毒/艾滋病组织的参与情况进行背景考察时,运用了定量和定性数据:一个是基于城市同性恋社区的社会变革环境;一个是城市中广泛关注信息/转介的环境;还有一个是郊区个人支持环境。这些环境吸引了不同类型的志愿者,并使他们在与环境、彼此以及社区的互动方式上有所不同。在定量分析中,外部政治效能感(即相信社会政治系统对变革努力的响应能力)显著区分了不同的环境,但最佳预测因素是环境调节的与量表动机的关系。定性数据更清晰地阐明了志愿者参与的动机,以及环境、动机、对社会政治参与的态度、个人和社区经历与认同之间复杂的内在关系。这些发现共同强调了这三个艾滋病组织各自独特但又相互关联的情况,以及背景方法在参与和赋权方面的价值。