Katz P P
University of California, San Francisco, Arthritis Research Group 94109, USA.
Arthritis Care Res. 1998 Feb;11(1):9-22. doi: 10.1002/art.1790110104.
This study examined appraisals of the impact of 7 stressors associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the perceived ability to cope with those stressors.
Subjects were 446 participants in a panel study of persons with RA. Data were derived from the 1994 annual interview.
There were significant differences among mean ratings of the stressors. Taking care of RA, fatigue, pain, and functional impairment were rated as having the greatest impact; perceived coping efficacy was highest for medication side effects and taking care of RA. Appraisals of impact and coping efficacy were negatively correlated. Clinical factors were the strongest predictors of both appraisals. Depressive symptoms and instrumental support were also independently associated with both appraisals for most stressors.
All of the stressors were problematic to some degree, suggesting that coping research should include stressors other than pain and function. Most subjects rated the effects of these stressors as moderate, however. Future examination of the coping responses of these individuals may shed light on adaptation to RA.
本研究调查了与类风湿关节炎(RA)相关的7种应激源的影响评估以及应对这些应激源的感知能力。
研究对象为446名参与RA患者小组研究的参与者。数据来自1994年的年度访谈。
应激源的平均评分存在显著差异。照顾RA、疲劳、疼痛和功能障碍被评为影响最大;对药物副作用和照顾RA的感知应对效能最高。影响评估和应对效能呈负相关。临床因素是两种评估的最强预测因素。抑郁症状和工具性支持在大多数应激源的两种评估中也独立相关。
所有应激源在某种程度上都存在问题,这表明应对研究应包括疼痛和功能以外的应激源。然而,大多数受试者将这些应激源的影响评为中等程度。未来对这些个体应对反应的研究可能会揭示对RA的适应情况。