Sandler A B
Thoracic Oncology Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Semin Oncol. 1998 Feb;25(1 Suppl 2):38-41.
Approximately 25% of all lung cancer cases diagnosed in 1993 were due to small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Approximately one third of all SCLC patients present with limited disease. Efforts to improve treatment results for patients with limited-stage SCLC include two recent meta-analyses of combined-modality treatment involving chemotherapy with thoracic radiotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. Both of these studies showed improvements in survival with the combined-modality approach. In addition, preliminary results of a Hoosier Oncology Group phase II study of cisplatin/ifosfamide/etoposide (VIP) in combination with thoracic radiotherapy in patients with limited disease indicate that VIP has an acceptable toxicity profile and should be studied further. For patients presenting with extensive-stage SCLC, several combination regimens have been shown to be effective in inducing responses of approximately 60%, although none has established superiority. Results of several studies evaluating the standard cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine (CAV) regimen versus cisplatin-containing combination regimens have shown no obvious survival advantage of the cisplatin regimens over CAV. On the other hand, results of a Hoosier Oncology Group study of VIP versus cisplatin/etoposide in extensive-disease SCLC showed that overall survival favored (P = .044) the VIP arm (9.1 months v 7.3 months), although these results need to be confirmed in another trial.
1993年诊断出的所有肺癌病例中,约25% 归因于小细胞肺癌(SCLC)。所有SCLC患者中约有三分之一表现为疾病局限。为改善局限期SCLC患者的治疗效果所做的努力包括最近两项关于联合治疗的荟萃分析,涉及化疗联合胸部放疗与单纯化疗的对比。这两项研究均表明联合治疗方法可提高生存率。此外,印第安纳肿瘤学组一项针对局限期患者的顺铂/异环磷酰胺/依托泊苷(VIP)联合胸部放疗的II期研究的初步结果表明,VIP的毒性可接受,应进一步研究。对于广泛期SCLC患者,几种联合方案已被证明可有效诱导约60% 的缓解率,尽管尚无一种方案确立了优势地位。多项评估标准的环磷酰胺/阿霉素/长春新碱(CAV)方案与含顺铂联合方案的研究结果表明,顺铂方案相较于CAV方案在生存方面并无明显优势。另一方面,印第安纳肿瘤学组一项在广泛期SCLC中比较VIP与顺铂/依托泊苷的研究结果显示,总体生存期有利于(P = 0.044)VIP组(9.1个月对7.3个月),尽管这些结果需要在另一项试验中得到证实。