Sanders J E, Bell D M, Okumura R M, Dralle A J
Department of Bioengineering and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1998 Mar;6(1):21-31. doi: 10.1109/86.662617.
Interface pressures and shear stresses were measured at 13 sites on two unilateral below-knee amputee subjects ambulating with lower-limb patellar-tendon-bearing prostheses. Interface stresses at the time of the first peak in the shank axial force-time curve were investigated at different socket-shank alignment settings. Stress magnitudes ranged from 1.2 to 214.7 kPa for pressure and 0.4 to 79.6 kPa for resultant shear stress, and changes in stress due to misalignment ranged from 1.3 to 80.7 kPa for pressure and from 0.2 to 38.0 kPa for resultant shear stress. For both subjects interface stress changes were much greater in the anterior socket region than in the lateral or posterior regions. Thus, alignment changes had a localized effect on interface stresses. Plots of alignment versus pressure or resultant shear stress were nonlinear for both subjects, in a number of cases maximizing or minimizing at the nominal alignment, indicating complex interface stress-alignment relationships. Variation (standard deviation/mean) was not significantly different for nominal versus misaligned steps, indicating that the subjects adapted well to the alignment changes. Session to session differences in interface stresses were typically larger than interface stress differences induced by alignment modifications. Thus, while these subjects compensated well for alignment changes to maintain consistent interface stresses within a session, they did not do so for different sessions conducted weeks apart.
在两名单侧膝下截肢者使用下肢髌腱承重假肢行走时,对其13个部位的界面压力和剪应力进行了测量。研究了在不同的接受腔-小腿对线设置下,小腿轴向力-时间曲线中第一个峰值出现时的界面应力。压力的应力大小范围为1.2至214.7 kPa,合成剪应力的范围为0.4至79.6 kPa,对线不良导致的压力应力变化范围为1.3至80.7 kPa,合成剪应力的变化范围为0.2至38.0 kPa。对于两名受试者,接受腔前部区域的界面应力变化远大于外侧或后部区域。因此,对线变化对界面应力有局部影响。两名受试者的对线与压力或合成剪应力的关系图均为非线性,在许多情况下,在标称对线时达到最大值或最小值,表明界面应力-对线关系复杂。标称步长与未对准步长的变化(标准差/平均值)无显著差异,表明受试者能很好地适应对线变化。不同时间段之间的界面应力差异通常大于对线调整引起的界面应力差异。因此,虽然这些受试者在一个时间段内能够很好地补偿对线变化以保持一致的界面应力,但在相隔数周进行的不同时间段内却并非如此。