• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Evaluation of the cost of a systematic early reperfusion of the infarction artery by primary or salvage angioplasty].

作者信息

Himbert D, Simon-Lorière Y, Juliard J M, Steg P G, Aumont M C, Gourgon R

机构信息

Centre de Cardiologie Bichat-Beaujon, Caisse nationale de l'Assurance Maladie, ELSM de Paris.

出版信息

Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1997 Nov;46(9):569-76.

PMID:9538368
Abstract

In order to evaluate the cost of a strategy designed to ensure a maximal early patency rate of the coronary artery responsible for acute myocardial infarction, we retrospectively studied 112 unselected, consecutive patients, treated during the 6 hours following onset of symptoms, either by intravenous thrombolysis (group 1, n = 57) followed by coronary angiography at the 90 th minute, and if necessary rescue angioplasty, or by primary angioplasty (group 2, n = 49), or finally by simple conventional medical treatment (group 3, contraindications to thrombolysis and catheterization, n = 6). The costs of medical treatment were expressed as standard mean costs, and were compared with total hospital expenditure. The overall hospital mortality was 8.0%: 3.5% in group 1, 8.2% in group 2, and 50% in group 3. The total cost of medical procedures during the initial hospital stay was 16,684 F, identical in groups 1 and 2 (17,985 F and 16,780 F, respectively). Total hospital expenditure was 36,254 F, with no significant difference between groups 1 and 2 (34,086 F and 41,670 F, respectively), despite a tendency towards a higher cost in group 2. This tendency reflected that of a longer hospital stay for patients in group 2, due to their more severe condition, but the proportion of medical cost within the total hospital expenditure was lower than in group 1 (40% and 53%, respectively). After one year of follow-up, only one other death from a cardiac cause was reported: the supplementary expenditure amounted to 14,617 F. This maximal reperfusion strategy during the acute phase of myocardial infarction achieved a low hospital mortality and one-year mortality, without a marked excess medical cost compared to previously published estimations. Primary angioplasty appears to have allowed a certain reduction of this cost compared to thrombolysis, but the heterogeneity of the study population does not allow direct comparison of the costs of the 2 reperfusion methods. One half of the total expenditure remains directly dependent on the duration of the hospital stay.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of the cost of a systematic early reperfusion of the infarction artery by primary or salvage angioplasty].
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1997 Nov;46(9):569-76.
2
Primary angioplasty is cost-minimizing compared with pre-hospital thrombolysis for patients within 60 min of a percutaneous coronary intervention center: the Comparison of Angioplasty and Pre-hospital Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPTIM) cost-efficacy sub-study.对于在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心60分钟内的患者,与院前溶栓相比,直接血管成形术可使成本最小化:急性心肌梗死血管成形术与院前溶栓比较(CAPTIM)成本效益亚研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Feb 15;45(4):515-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.031.
3
[Direct percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarct treated at the Cardiac Center of the General Medical School Hospital in Prague: a 1-year retrospective study].[布拉格综合医学院医院心脏中心对急性心肌梗死患者进行直接经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术:一项为期1年的回顾性研究]
Vnitr Lek. 2002 May;48(5):373-9.
4
Cost and health outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus thrombolysis in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-Results of the Swedish Early Decision reperfusion Study (SWEDES) trial.直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与溶栓治疗急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的成本和健康结局-瑞典早期决策再灌注研究(SWEDES)试验结果。
Am Heart J. 2010 Aug;160(2):322-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.05.008.
5
[Comparison of the cost effectiveness of treatment of acute myocardial infarct with primary angioplasty and thrombolysis ].[急性心肌梗死采用直接血管成形术与溶栓治疗的成本效益比较]
Vnitr Lek. 2003 Feb;49(2):97-102.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention compared with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction transferred from community hospitals.与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比,在从社区医院转诊的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,实施辅助经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Clin Ther. 2006 Jul;28(7):1054-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.07.007.
7
Interhospital transport for primary angioplasty improves the long-term outcome of acute myocardial infarction compared with immediate thrombolysis in the nearest hospital (one-year follow-up of the PRAGUE-1 study).与在最近医院进行即刻溶栓治疗相比,初级血管成形术的院间转运改善了急性心肌梗死的长期预后(PRAGUE-1研究的一年随访结果)。
Can J Cardiol. 2003 Sep;19(10):1133-7.
8
[Treatment of acute myocardial infarction in Switzerland: is emergency PTCA more costly than thrombolysis?].
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1999 Oct 2;129(39):1389-96.
9
Treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in West Pomerania province of Poland. Comparison between primary coronary intervention and thrombolytic therapy.波兰西波美拉尼亚省急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的治疗。直接冠状动脉介入治疗与溶栓治疗的比较。
Kardiol Pol. 2006 Jun;64(6):591-9; discussion 600-1.
10
In-hospital and one-year outcomes of patients with high-risk acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis or primary coronary angioplasty.接受溶栓治疗或直接冠状动脉血管成形术的高危急性心肌梗死患者的院内及一年期预后
Ital Heart J. 2004 Feb;5(2):136-45.