• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[通过运动试验评估冠心病患者中苄普地尔和地尔硫䓬抗缺血作用的比较。一项多中心研究。研究小组]

[Comparison of anti-ischemic effect of bepridil and diltiazem evaluated by exercise test in patients with coronary disease. A multicenter study. Groupe d'Investigateurs].

作者信息

Sellier P, Quilliet L

机构信息

Service de Réadaptation Cardiaque. Hôpital Broussais, Paris.

出版信息

Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1997 Nov;46(9):602-8.

PMID:9538375
Abstract

Bepridil (Cordium) is a calcium channel blocker which has been demonstrated to be effective in the preventive treatment of angina. Few controlled trials have compared bepridil to diltiazem (Tildiem), the reference calcium channel blocker. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bepridil in stable coronary patients. 148 patients (139 M, 9 F, mean age: 58 +/- 8.6 years), with documented coronary artery disease and positive stress test after 5 days of placebo were included. After double-blind randomization, they received bepridil (300 mg/day ion 3 doses), or diltiazem (180 mg+/day in 3 doses) for 15 days. A stress test was then performed under the same conditions as on inclusion. The anti-ischaemic efficacy of the two drugs was comparable. Total work increased from 4,552.4 +/- 2,179.4 Kpm a 6,103.2 +/- 2,849.2 Kpm with bepridil (p < or = 0.0001) and from 4,524.8 +/- 2,160.5 Kpm a 5,848.3 +/- 2,800.3 Kpm (p < or = 0.0001) with diltiazem, with no intergroup difference. Duration of effort was significantly prolonged: from 10.5 +/- 3.0 min to 12.5 +/- 3.3 min with bepridil (p < or = 0.0001) and from 10.5 +/- 2.9 min to 12.1 +/- 3.4 min with diltiazem (p < or = 0.0001), with no intergroup difference. The time to onset of 1 min of ST depression increased significantly between the two stress tests, from 8.36 +/- 2.7 min to 10.82 +/- 3.4 min with bepridil (p < or = 0.001) and from 8.02 +/- 3.0 min to 10.53 +/- 3.6 min with diltiazem (p < or = 0.001), with no significant difference between the two groups. The clinical safety of the two products was comparable. On the electrocardiogram, the QT interval was significantly prolonged with bepridil, from 368.6 +/- 37.5 msec to 393.6 +/- 38.7 msec (p < or = 0.0001), reflecting cellular impregnation of the drug.

摘要

苄普地尔(Cordium)是一种钙通道阻滞剂,已被证明在心绞痛的预防性治疗中有效。很少有对照试验将苄普地尔与作为对照的钙通道阻滞剂地尔硫䓬(Tildiem)进行比较。本研究的目的是评估苄普地尔在稳定型冠心病患者中的疗效和安全性。纳入了148例患者(139例男性,9例女性,平均年龄:58±8.6岁),这些患者有冠状动脉疾病的记录且在服用安慰剂5天后运动试验呈阳性。经过双盲随机分组后,他们接受苄普地尔(300mg/天,分3次服用)或地尔硫䓬(180mg/天,分3次服用),持续15天。然后在与纳入时相同的条件下进行运动试验。两种药物的抗缺血疗效相当。使用苄普地尔时,总功从4552.4±2179.4千帕米增加到6103.2±2849.2千帕米(p≤0.0001),使用地尔硫䓬时从4524.8±2160.5千帕米增加到5848.3±2800.3千帕米(p≤0.0001),两组间无差异。运动持续时间显著延长:使用苄普地尔时从10.5±3.0分钟延长到12.5±3.3分钟(p≤0.0001),使用地尔硫䓬时从10.5±2.9分钟延长到12.1±3.4分钟(p≤0.0001),两组间无差异。两次运动试验之间,ST段压低1分钟的起始时间显著增加,使用苄普地尔时从8.36±2.7分钟增加到10.82±3.4分钟(p≤0.001),使用地尔硫䓬时从8.02±3.0分钟增加到10.53±3.6分钟(p≤0.001),两组间无显著差异。两种产品的临床安全性相当。在心电图上,苄普地尔使QT间期显著延长,从368.6±37.5毫秒延长到393.6±38.7毫秒(p≤0.0001),这反映了药物的细胞内蓄积。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of anti-ischemic effect of bepridil and diltiazem evaluated by exercise test in patients with coronary disease. A multicenter study. Groupe d'Investigateurs].[通过运动试验评估冠心病患者中苄普地尔和地尔硫䓬抗缺血作用的比较。一项多中心研究。研究小组]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1997 Nov;46(9):602-8.
2
[Value of the combination of trimetazidine (Vastarel 20 mg) with diltiazem (Tildiem 60 mg) in stable effort angina. A double-blind versus placebo multicenter study].[曲美他嗪(万爽力20毫克)与地尔硫䓬(恬尔心60毫克)联合用于稳定型劳力性心绞痛的价值。一项双盲、与安慰剂对照的多中心研究]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1995 Apr;44(4):203-12.
3
[Comparison of the antispastic effect of Bi-Tildiem 120 mg and Tildiem 60mg].[必得利120毫克与恬尔心60毫克抗痉挛效果的比较]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1995 Sep;44(7):372-7.
4
[Evaluation of amlodipine in stable effort angina. Comparison with diltiazem in terms of efficacy, tolerability and maintenance of the anti-ischemic action 24 hours after the last dose].氨氯地平治疗稳定型劳力性心绞痛的评估。与地尔硫䓬在疗效、耐受性及末次给药后24小时抗缺血作用维持情况方面的比较
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1996 Feb;45(2):74-82.
5
[Diltiazem in chronic stable angina].[地尔硫䓬用于慢性稳定型心绞痛]
Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1986 Jul-Aug;56(4):327-32.
6
[Comparative study of the efficacy and tolerability of bepridil and diltiazem in unstable angina. 277 patients].[苄普地尔与地尔硫䓬治疗不稳定型心绞痛的疗效和耐受性比较研究。277例患者]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1994 Feb;43(2):77-83.
7
[Comparative study of the mid-term electrocardiographic and clinical tolerability of bepridil versus diltiazem in patients with coronary disease].[冠心病患者中苄普地尔与地尔硫䓬中期心电图及临床耐受性的比较研究]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1990 Sep;39(7):437-42.
8
[Incremental doses of diltiazem in patients with coronary artery disease in end-stage renal failure maintained on hemodialysis: which is the optimal dose?].[接受血液透析维持治疗的终末期肾病合并冠状动脉疾病患者递增剂量地尔硫䓬:最佳剂量是多少?]
Cardiologia. 1998 Dec;43(12):1337-43.
9
[Comparison of the effects of bepridil and diltiazem in Prinzmetal's angina. Crossed, randomized, double-blind study. Apropos of 14 cases].[普尼拉明与地尔硫䓬对变异型心绞痛疗效的比较。交叉、随机、双盲研究。附14例报告]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1986 Mar;35(3):167-72.
10
[Dose-response relation of gallopamil in comparison with nifedipine, diltiazem and tiapamil in patients with coronary heart disease].[冠心病患者中加洛帕米与硝苯地平、地尔硫䓬和替帕米的剂量反应关系]
Z Kardiol. 1989;78 Suppl 5:69-76.