Suppr超能文献

[通过运动试验评估冠心病患者中苄普地尔和地尔硫䓬抗缺血作用的比较。一项多中心研究。研究小组]

[Comparison of anti-ischemic effect of bepridil and diltiazem evaluated by exercise test in patients with coronary disease. A multicenter study. Groupe d'Investigateurs].

作者信息

Sellier P, Quilliet L

机构信息

Service de Réadaptation Cardiaque. Hôpital Broussais, Paris.

出版信息

Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1997 Nov;46(9):602-8.

PMID:9538375
Abstract

Bepridil (Cordium) is a calcium channel blocker which has been demonstrated to be effective in the preventive treatment of angina. Few controlled trials have compared bepridil to diltiazem (Tildiem), the reference calcium channel blocker. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bepridil in stable coronary patients. 148 patients (139 M, 9 F, mean age: 58 +/- 8.6 years), with documented coronary artery disease and positive stress test after 5 days of placebo were included. After double-blind randomization, they received bepridil (300 mg/day ion 3 doses), or diltiazem (180 mg+/day in 3 doses) for 15 days. A stress test was then performed under the same conditions as on inclusion. The anti-ischaemic efficacy of the two drugs was comparable. Total work increased from 4,552.4 +/- 2,179.4 Kpm a 6,103.2 +/- 2,849.2 Kpm with bepridil (p < or = 0.0001) and from 4,524.8 +/- 2,160.5 Kpm a 5,848.3 +/- 2,800.3 Kpm (p < or = 0.0001) with diltiazem, with no intergroup difference. Duration of effort was significantly prolonged: from 10.5 +/- 3.0 min to 12.5 +/- 3.3 min with bepridil (p < or = 0.0001) and from 10.5 +/- 2.9 min to 12.1 +/- 3.4 min with diltiazem (p < or = 0.0001), with no intergroup difference. The time to onset of 1 min of ST depression increased significantly between the two stress tests, from 8.36 +/- 2.7 min to 10.82 +/- 3.4 min with bepridil (p < or = 0.001) and from 8.02 +/- 3.0 min to 10.53 +/- 3.6 min with diltiazem (p < or = 0.001), with no significant difference between the two groups. The clinical safety of the two products was comparable. On the electrocardiogram, the QT interval was significantly prolonged with bepridil, from 368.6 +/- 37.5 msec to 393.6 +/- 38.7 msec (p < or = 0.0001), reflecting cellular impregnation of the drug.

摘要

苄普地尔(Cordium)是一种钙通道阻滞剂,已被证明在心绞痛的预防性治疗中有效。很少有对照试验将苄普地尔与作为对照的钙通道阻滞剂地尔硫䓬(Tildiem)进行比较。本研究的目的是评估苄普地尔在稳定型冠心病患者中的疗效和安全性。纳入了148例患者(139例男性,9例女性,平均年龄:58±8.6岁),这些患者有冠状动脉疾病的记录且在服用安慰剂5天后运动试验呈阳性。经过双盲随机分组后,他们接受苄普地尔(300mg/天,分3次服用)或地尔硫䓬(180mg/天,分3次服用),持续15天。然后在与纳入时相同的条件下进行运动试验。两种药物的抗缺血疗效相当。使用苄普地尔时,总功从4552.4±2179.4千帕米增加到6103.2±2849.2千帕米(p≤0.0001),使用地尔硫䓬时从4524.8±2160.5千帕米增加到5848.3±2800.3千帕米(p≤0.0001),两组间无差异。运动持续时间显著延长:使用苄普地尔时从10.5±3.0分钟延长到12.5±3.3分钟(p≤0.0001),使用地尔硫䓬时从10.5±2.9分钟延长到12.1±3.4分钟(p≤0.0001),两组间无差异。两次运动试验之间,ST段压低1分钟的起始时间显著增加,使用苄普地尔时从8.36±2.7分钟增加到10.82±3.4分钟(p≤0.001),使用地尔硫䓬时从8.02±3.0分钟增加到10.53±3.6分钟(p≤0.001),两组间无显著差异。两种产品的临床安全性相当。在心电图上,苄普地尔使QT间期显著延长,从368.6±37.5毫秒延长到393.6±38.7毫秒(p≤0.0001),这反映了药物的细胞内蓄积。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验