Campos J H, Massa F C
Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242-1079, USA.
Anesth Analg. 1998 Apr;86(4):696-700. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199804000-00003.
Anatomic variation between tracheal carina and the take-off of the right upper bronchus often makes the use of a right-sided double-lumen tube (R-DLT) or a single-lumen tube with right-sided enclosed bronchial blocker tube (R-UBB) (Univent) undesirable. This study compared the R-DLT with the R-UBB to determine whether there was any advantage of one over the other during anesthesia with one-lung ventilation (OLV) for right-sided thoracic surgeries. Forty patients requiring right lung deflation were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Twenty patients received a right-sided BronchoCath double-lumen tube, and 20 received a Univent tube with a bronchial blocker placed in the right mainstem bronchus. The following were studied: 1) time required to position each tube until satisfactory placement was achieved; 2) number of times that fiberoptic bronchoscopy was required (including one with the patient supine and one in lateral decubitus position); 3) number of malpositions after initial confirmation of tube placement; 4) time required until lung collapse; 5) surgical exposure; and 6) cost of tubes per case. No differences were found with any of these variables except that the cost of acquisition overall was greater for the R-UBB than for the R-DLT. No right upper lobe collapse was observed in the postoperative period in the chest radiograph in any of the patients studied. We conclude that either tube can be used safely and effectively for right-sided thoracic surgeries that require anesthesia for OLV.
In this study, right-sided double-lumen tubes were compared with the Univent with right-sided bronchial blockers. The results indicate that either tube can be used for right-sided thoracic surgery.
气管隆突与右上支气管起始部之间的解剖变异常常使得使用右侧双腔管(R-DLT)或带有右侧封闭支气管阻塞管(R-UBB)(Univent)的单腔管不太理想。本研究比较了R-DLT和R-UBB,以确定在右侧胸科手术单肺通气(OLV)麻醉期间,二者是否存在优势差异。40例需要右肺萎陷的患者被随机分为两组。20例患者接受右侧支气管导管双腔管,20例接受在右主支气管放置支气管阻塞器的Univent管。研究了以下内容:1)将每根导管放置至满意位置所需的时间;2)所需纤维支气管镜检查的次数(包括患者仰卧位时1次和侧卧位时1次);3)初次确认导管位置后出现错位的次数;4)直至肺萎陷所需的时间;5)手术视野暴露情况;6)每例导管的费用。除了R-UBB的总体购置成本高于R-DLT外,这些变量均未发现差异。在所研究的任何患者中,术后胸部X线片均未观察到右上叶萎陷。我们得出结论,对于需要OLV麻醉的右侧胸科手术,两种导管均可安全有效地使用。
在本研究中,对右侧双腔管与带有右侧支气管阻塞器的Univent管进行了比较。结果表明,两种导管均可用于右侧胸科手术。