McCullough P A, Thompson R J, Tobin K J, Kahn J K, O'Neill W W
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Heart and Vascular Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Clin Cardiol. 1998 Mar;21(3):195-200. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960210312.
There is currently no well-accepted model for early and accurate prediction of neurologic and vital outcomes after cardiac arrest. Recent studies indicate that individuals with acute myocardial ischemia as the etiology for the arrest may benefit from early revascularization.
This study was undertaken to examine whether the cardiac arrest score is valid for predicting outcomes upon arrival at the emergency department.
We previously developed a cardiac arrest score based on time to return of spontaneous circulation, initial systolic blood pressure, and level of neurologic alertness in 127 patients (derivation set). This score was prospectively applied to 62 patients with similar clinical profiles (validation set). Utility of the score was evaluated by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curves (C) for both sets. Consistency was measured by using the alpha statistic applied to the cumulative survival at each ascending level of the score.
The derivation and validation sets were similar with respect to baseline characteristics and proportions at each level of score. The survival to discharge was 41.7 and 53.2% for the two sets, respectively. The value of C was 0.89 +/- 0.03 and 0.93 +/- 0.03 for neurologic recovery and 0.81 +/- 0.04 and 0.92 +/- 0.04 for survival to discharge in the two sets, respectively. The level of agreement between the sets across the levels of the score was 0.98 and 0.99 (both p < 0.0001) for the two outcomes.
The cardiac arrest score is a valid decision support tool in the evaluation of cardiac arrest victims. Patients with the most favorable scores may be considered for early angiography and revascularization if myocardial ischemia is the etiology of the arrest.
目前尚无被广泛接受的用于早期准确预测心脏骤停后神经和生命预后的模型。近期研究表明,以急性心肌缺血为心脏骤停病因的个体可能从早期血运重建中获益。
本研究旨在检验心脏骤停评分在预测患者到达急诊科时的预后方面是否有效。
我们先前基于127例患者(推导集)自主循环恢复时间、初始收缩压和神经清醒程度制定了心脏骤停评分。该评分前瞻性地应用于62例具有相似临床特征的患者(验证集)。通过两组受试者工作特征曲线下面积(C)评估评分的效用。使用应用于评分每个递增水平累积生存率的α统计量来衡量一致性。
推导集和验证集在基线特征和各评分水平的比例方面相似。两组患者出院生存率分别为41.7%和53.2%。两组中神经功能恢复的C值分别为0.89±0.03和0.93±0.03,出院生存率的C值分别为0.81±0.04和0.92±0.04。对于这两个预后,两组在评分各水平之间的一致性水平分别为0.98和0.99(均p<0.0001)。
心脏骤停评分是评估心脏骤停患者的有效决策支持工具。如果心肌缺血是心脏骤停的病因,对于评分最有利的患者可考虑早期血管造影和血运重建。