Gaertner E, Petro G, de Jong P
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Groote Schuur Hospital.
S Afr Med J. 1998 Feb;88(2 Suppl):187-8, 191-2.
To compare the efficacy of a novel footpump suction evacuator with the manual vacuum aspirator in the management of women with incomplete abortions requiring uterine evacuation.
A prospective comparative analysis of women allocated to either manual vacuum aspiration of the uterus or footpump suction evacuation, following first- or second-trimester incomplete abortion.
The gynaecology casualty theatre, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town.
121 women with first- or second-trimester abortions. Patients with signs of septic abortion were excluded from the study.
Uterine evacuation under general anaesthesia by means of a manual vacuum aspirator or a novel footpump suction evacuator.
Endpoints assessed included duration of the procedures, ease of evacuation, estimated blood loss, volume of products of conception obtained, postoperative complications of the procedures and amount of analgesia required postoperatively.
The manual vacuum aspirator and footpump suction evacuator appeared equally effective for uterine evacuation. There were no significant differences in the endpoints assessed.
Both methods appear equally effective for uterine evacuation.
比较新型脚踏式吸引器与手动负压吸引器在处理需清宫的不全流产女性中的疗效。
对早孕期或中孕期不全流产后接受子宫手动负压吸引或脚踏式吸引清宫的女性进行前瞻性对比分析。
开普敦格罗特·舒尔医院妇科急诊手术室。
121例早孕期或中孕期流产女性。有感染性流产迹象的患者被排除在研究之外。
在全身麻醉下通过手动负压吸引器或新型脚踏式吸引器进行清宫。
评估的终点指标包括手术时间、清宫难易程度、估计失血量、吸出的妊娠物量、术后手术并发症及术后所需镇痛量。
手动负压吸引器和脚踏式吸引器在清宫方面似乎同样有效。所评估的终点指标无显著差异。
两种方法在清宫方面似乎同样有效。
