Albadalejo J, Alonso R, Antinozzi R, Bogard M, Bourgault A M, Colucci G, Fenner T, Petersen H, Sala E, Vincelette J, Young C
Servicio de Microbiologia Clinica y Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain.
J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Apr;36(4):862-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.4.862-865.1998.
The benefits shown by the recent introduction of PCR for the in vitro diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has prompted the development of standardized, ready-to-use assays that can be implemented in routine clinical laboratories. We have evaluated the clinical performance of COBAS AMPLICOR HCV (COBAS), the first instrument system that allows the automation of HCV RNA amplification and detection, to determine its performance in the routine laboratory setting. More than 2,000 specimens collected at five centers were analyzed in parallel by the COBAS and the manual AMPLICOR HCV (AMPLICOR) tests, and the results were compared with the results for biochemical and serological markers of HCV. In this study the two PCR systems showed the same accuracy, with a concordance rate of 99.8%. As expected, the correlation between serology and PCR was not absolute because the presence of anti-HCV antibodies may be associated with a latent or past infection. On the other hand, if the presence of confirmed anti-HCV antibodies and elevated alanine aminotransferase levels are taken as the "gold standard," indicating an active, ongoing infection, the COBAS and AMPLICOR tests show high and comparable sensitivities (100%) and specificities (98%), with positive and negative predictive values of 100 and 97%, respectively. During the study no false-positive reactions were detected. The use of an internal control allowed the identification of inhibitory substances that prevented amplification for 0.3 and 0.4% of samples tested by the COBAS and AMPLICOR tests, respectively. Compared to the manual system, the COBAS system allowed a significant reduction of hands-on time and could improve the overall laboratory work flow. In conclusion, these results support the use of the COBAS and AMPLICOR tests for the molecular diagnosis of active HCV infections.
近期采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的体外诊断所显示出的优势,促使了可在常规临床实验室中应用的标准化即用型检测方法的开发。我们评估了COBAS AMPLICOR HCV检测系统(COBAS)的临床性能,这是首个可实现HCV RNA扩增与检测自动化的仪器系统,以确定其在常规实验室环境中的表现。五个中心收集的2000多份样本同时采用COBAS和手工操作的AMPLICOR HCV检测法(AMPLICOR)进行分析,并将结果与HCV的生化和血清学标志物检测结果进行比较。在本研究中,两种PCR系统显示出相同的准确性,一致率为99.8%。正如预期的那样,血清学与PCR之间的相关性并非绝对,因为抗HCV抗体的存在可能与潜伏性或既往感染相关。另一方面,如果将确诊的抗HCV抗体的存在以及丙氨酸转氨酶水平升高作为“金标准”,表明存在活动性、正在进行的感染,那么COBAS和AMPLICOR检测法显示出高且相当的敏感性(100%)和特异性(98%),阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为100%和97%。在研究过程中未检测到假阳性反应。使用内部对照可识别出分别导致COBAS和AMPLICOR检测法所检测样本中0.3%和0.4%无法进行扩增的抑制性物质。与手工系统相比,COBAS系统显著减少了实际操作时间,并可改善整体实验室工作流程。总之,这些结果支持使用COBAS和AMPLICOR检测法对活动性HCV感染进行分子诊断。