Verhelst M P, Mulier J C, Hoogmartens M J, Spaas F
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Jul-Aug(118):93-9.
In 20 patients the following 3 techniques have been used for ankle fusion, all with a lateral transfibular approach: (1) fibular grafting; (2) lateral removal of the distal fibula and fixation with 3 Blount staples; (3) removal of the distal fibular and fixation with Charnley compression clamps. The compression technique, through a lateral approach, was found to be superior as it avoids section of tendons. Removal of the distal portion of the fibular eliminates the risk of drainage and problems with wound healing due to the presence of a large bone graft immediately underneath the skin. Fusion is obtained more rapidly with the third than the first and second techniques. Pain seems to be related to osteoarthritis of the surrounding joints. The gait pattern depends not only on pain, but also on the position of the foot and on the posterior displacement of the talus. Less osteoarthritis as a result of shorter immoblizaition is the most favorable factor, notwithstanding the longer preoperative period in the third than in the first two methods.
在20例患者中,采用了以下3种踝关节融合技术,均采用经腓骨外侧入路:(1)腓骨移植;(2)外侧切除腓骨远端并用3枚布朗钉固定;(3)切除腓骨远端并用查恩利加压夹固定。通过外侧入路的加压技术被发现更具优势,因为它避免了肌腱切断。切除腓骨远端消除了因皮肤下方存在大的骨移植而导致引流和伤口愈合问题的风险。与第一种和第二种技术相比,第三种技术能更快实现融合。疼痛似乎与周围关节的骨关节炎有关。步态模式不仅取决于疼痛,还取决于足部位置和距骨后移情况。尽管第三种方法的术前时间比前两种方法长,但由于固定时间较短,骨关节炎较少是最有利的因素。