Astrelin A V, Sokolov M V, Behnisch T, Reymann K G, Voronin L L
Department of Mathematics and Mechanics, Moscow State University, Vorobiovy Gory, Russia.
J Neurosci Methods. 1998 Feb 20;79(2):169-86. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(97)00190-8.
'Minimal' excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) are often recorded from central neurones, specifically for quantal analysis. However the EPSPs may emerge from activation of several fibres or transmission sites so that formal quantal analysis may give false results. Here we extended application of the principal component analysis (PCA) to minimal EPSPs. We tested a PCA algorithm and a new graphical 'alignment' procedure against both simulated data and hippocampal EPSPs. Minimal EPSPs were recorded before and up to 3.5 h following induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) in CA1 neurones. In 29 out of 45 EPSPs, two (N=22) or three (N=7) components were detected which differed in latencies, rise time (Trise) or both. The detected differences ranged from 0.6 to 7.8 ms for the latency and from 1.6-9 ms for Trise. Different components behaved differently following LTP induction. Cases were found when one component was potentiated immediately after tetanus whereas the other with a delay of 15-60 min. The immediately potentiated component could decline in 1-2 h so that the two components contributed differently into early (< 1 h) LTP1 and later (1-4 h) LTP2 phases. The noise deconvolution techniques was applied to both conventional EPSP amplitudes and scores of separate components. Cases are illustrated when quantal size (upsilon) estimated from the EPSP amplitudes increased whereas upsilon estimated from the component scores was stable during LTP1. Analysis of component scores could show apparent double-fold increases in upsilon which are interpreted as reflections of synchronized quantal releases. In general, the results demonstrate PCA applicability to separate EPSPs into different components and its usefulness for precise analysis of synaptic transmission.
“微小”兴奋性突触后电位(EPSP)常从中枢神经元记录得到,特别是用于量子分析。然而,这些EPSP可能源于多条纤维或多个传递位点的激活,因此形式上的量子分析可能会得出错误结果。在此,我们将主成分分析(PCA)的应用扩展到微小EPSP。我们针对模拟数据和海马体EPSP测试了一种PCA算法和一种新的图形“对齐”程序。在CA1神经元中诱导长时程增强(LTP)之前及之后长达3.5小时记录微小EPSP。在45个EPSP中的29个中,检测到两个(N = 22)或三个(N = 7)成分,它们在潜伏期、上升时间(Trise)或两者上存在差异。检测到的潜伏期差异范围为0.6至7.8毫秒,Trise差异范围为1.6至9毫秒。不同成分在LTP诱导后的表现不同。发现有些情况是,一个成分在强直刺激后立即增强,而另一个则延迟15至60分钟增强。立即增强的成分可能在1至2小时内下降,因此这两个成分对早期(<1小时)LTP1和后期(1至4小时)LTP2阶段的贡献不同。噪声反卷积技术应用于传统EPSP幅度和单独成分的分数。举例说明了从EPSP幅度估计的量子大小(υ)增加,而从成分分数估计的υ在LTP1期间保持稳定的情况。对成分分数的分析可以显示υ明显加倍增加,这被解释为同步量子释放的反映。总体而言,结果表明PCA适用于将单独的EPSP分离为不同成分,并且对精确分析突触传递有用。