Woittiez A J, Huysmans F T, Bailey R, Robson R A, Mion Júnior D, Villa G, Kobrin I
Twenteborg Ziekenhuis, Almelo, The Netherlands.
Clin Nephrol. 1998 Mar;49(3):160-6.
The antihypertensive efficacy and safety of mibefradil and nifedipine SR were compared in 143 patients with chronic renal failure and mild-to-moderate hypertension in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-design study. At treatment week 12, a significantly greater decrease in sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) was seen with mibefradil than with nifedipine SR (12.8 mmHg vs 8.1 mmHg, respectively; p = 0.014). A significantly greater number of mibefradil-treated patients achieved normalization of SDBP by week 12 (62% vs 37%; p < 0.01). The changes in renal function parameters and the incidence of adverse events were similar in both groups. In this population, 12 weeks of treatment with mibefradil were more effective than nifedipine SR for lowering blood pressure and had similar effects on renal function parameters.
在一项多中心、双盲、随机、平行设计的研究中,对143例慢性肾功能衰竭合并轻至中度高血压患者比较了米贝拉地尔和硝苯地平缓释片的降压疗效及安全性。在治疗第12周时,米贝拉地尔组的坐位舒张压(SDBP)下降幅度显著大于硝苯地平缓释片组(分别为12.8 mmHg和8.1 mmHg;p = 0.014)。到第12周时,米贝拉地尔治疗组中SDBP恢复正常的患者数量显著更多(62%对37%;p < 0.01)。两组的肾功能参数变化及不良事件发生率相似。在该人群中,米贝拉地尔治疗12周在降低血压方面比硝苯地平缓释片更有效,且对肾功能参数的影响相似。