Suppr超能文献

抗惊厥药理学的新视野。

New visions in the pharmacology of anticonvulsion.

作者信息

Löscher W

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy, School of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Pharmacol. 1998 Jan 19;342(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(97)01514-8.

Abstract

Seizures are resistant to treatment with currently available anticonvulsant drugs in about 1 out of 3 patients with epilepsy. Thus, there is a need for new, more effective anticonvulsant drugs for intractable epilepsy. Furthermore, because of the inadequacy of the currently available anticonvulsant armamentarium with respect to safety, newly developed drugs should be less toxic than existing drugs. Previous and current strategies for development of novel anticonvulsants with improved efficacy or safety are critically discussed in this review. 'Old drugs' (or 'first generation' drugs), which were developed and introduced between 1910 and 1970, are compared with new anticonvulsants both in terms of clinical efficacy and safety and in terms of mechanisms of action. The new drugs are referred to as 'second generation' drugs, i.e. anticonvulsants which have been introduced into clinical practice in recent years, or 'third generation' drugs, i.e. compounds in the pipeline of development. In spite of some 30 years of 'modern' neuroscientific epilepsy research, most novel, clinically effective second generation anticonvulsants have been found by screening (i.e. serendipity) or structural variation of known drugs and not by rational strategies based on knowledge of processes involved in generation of seizures or in development of epilepsy. An exception are only the GABA (gamma-aminobutyrate)-mimetic drugs vigabatrin and tiagabine and, to some extent, gabapentin, which have been developed by a rational strategy, i.e. the 'GABA hypothesis' of epilepsy. The fact that preclinical seizure models used for identification and development of novel drugs have been originally validated by old drugs, i.e. conventional anticonvulsants, may explain that several of the new drugs possess mechanisms which do not differ from those of the standard drugs. This may also explain that none of the new drugs seems to offer any marked advantage towards the old, first generation drugs with respect to the ultimate goal of drug treatment of epilepsy, i.e. complete control of seizures, although some of the second generation drugs may have benefits in terms of side effects and tolerability. It is to be hoped that the various novel currently used or planned strategies for drug development produce more effective and safe anticonvulsants than previous strategies. This goal can only be achieved by strengthening our understanding of the fundamental pathophysiology of seizure expression and epileptogenesis as theoretical substrates for new pharmacological strategies, and by devising and refining laboratory models for studying new agents obtained by such strategies.

摘要

在每3名癫痫患者中,约有1名患者的癫痫发作对目前可用的抗惊厥药物治疗无效。因此,需要研发新的、更有效的抗惊厥药物来治疗难治性癫痫。此外,由于目前可用的抗惊厥药物在安全性方面存在不足,新开发的药物应比现有药物毒性更低。本综述对以往和当前开发疗效更佳或安全性更高的新型抗惊厥药物的策略进行了批判性讨论。将1910年至1970年间开发并引入的“老药”(或“第一代”药物)与新型抗惊厥药物在临床疗效、安全性及作用机制方面进行了比较。这些新药被称为“第二代”药物,即近年来已应用于临床的抗惊厥药物,或“第三代”药物,即尚在研发阶段的化合物。尽管现代神经科学对癫痫的研究已有约30年,但大多数新型、临床有效的第二代抗惊厥药物都是通过筛选(即偶然发现)或对已知药物进行结构改造而发现的,而非基于对癫痫发作产生过程或癫痫发展过程的认识所采用的合理策略。唯一的例外是γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)模拟药物氨己烯酸和替加宾,以及在一定程度上的加巴喷丁,它们是通过合理策略,即癫痫的“GABA假说”开发出来的。用于识别和开发新药的临床前癫痫模型最初是由老药(即传统抗惊厥药物)验证的,这一事实可能解释了几种新药的作用机制与标准药物并无差异。这也可能解释了,就癫痫药物治疗的最终目标,即完全控制癫痫发作而言,似乎没有一种新药相对于第一代老药具有明显优势,尽管一些第二代药物在副作用和耐受性方面可能具有优势。希望目前正在使用或计划采用的各种新型药物研发策略能够研发出比以往策略更有效、更安全的抗惊厥药物。只有通过加强我们对癫痫发作表现和癫痫发生的基本病理生理学的理解,将其作为新药理学策略的理论基础,并设计和完善实验室模型来研究通过这些策略获得的新药物,才能实现这一目标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验