• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Breast cancer risk assessment: use of complete pedigree information and the effect of misspecified ages at diagnosis of affected relatives.

作者信息

Schmidt S, Becher H, Chang-Claude J

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Hum Genet. 1998 Mar;102(3):348-56. doi: 10.1007/s004390050704.

DOI:10.1007/s004390050704
PMID:9544851
Abstract

Reliable risk estimates for hereditary breast cancer are important for the genetic counseling of women who have one or more first- and/or second-degree relatives affected by the disease. If no mutation analysis of known high-penetrance breast cancer genes is performed, risk estimation is often based on published reference tables. These tables express a woman's age-specific risk of breast cancer as a function of the ages at diagnosis of one or two affected relatives with different degrees of relationship to the counselee. However, unaffected relatives are not taken into account when these estimates are derived. We report here the extent to which risk estimation is influenced by the number and ages of any unaffected relatives and by the exact genealogical relationship between the proband and affected relative rather than merely the degree. Additionally, we describe the sensitivity of risk estimates when ages at diagnosis of affected relatives are misspecified because of inaccurate information supplied by the counselee. We determined a proband's probability of being a carrier of a highly penetrant breast cancer susceptibility gene, such as BRCA1 or BRCA2, by likelihood calculations that take into account information from the entire pedigree. This genetic risk was used to estimate a phenotypic lifetime breast cancer risk, which was compared with the risks derived from the published reference tables. We demonstrate numerically that the tabulated values tend to over-estimate the probands risk and that the extent of over-estimation depends greatly on the number and ages of unaffected relatives. The validity of the relatives ages at diagnosis can affect risk predictions considerably in small families with two or three affected relatives. Furthermore, the magnitude of the estimated breast cancer risks depends upon the assumed genetic model and can therefore vary appreciably when different penetrance estimates are used.

摘要

相似文献

1
Breast cancer risk assessment: use of complete pedigree information and the effect of misspecified ages at diagnosis of affected relatives.
Hum Genet. 1998 Mar;102(3):348-56. doi: 10.1007/s004390050704.
2
Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history.基于家族病史携带乳腺癌-卵巢癌基因BRCA1突变的概率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Feb 5;89(3):227-38. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.3.227.
3
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
4
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation predictions using the BOADICEA and BRCAPRO models and penetrance estimation in high-risk French-Canadian families.使用BOADICEA和BRCAPRO模型对高危法裔加拿大家庭进行BRCA1和BRCA2突变预测及外显率估计
Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8(1):R3. doi: 10.1186/bcr1365. Epub 2005 Dec 12.
5
Population-based estimate of the average age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer for a defined set of protein-truncating mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Australian Breast Cancer Family Study.基于人群的BRCA1和BRCA2中一组特定蛋白质截短突变的乳腺癌平均年龄特异性累积风险估计。澳大利亚乳腺癌家族研究。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Sep;8(9):741-7.
6
Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population-based study.一项基于人群的研究中除BRCA1和BRCA2外的其他乳腺癌易感基因的证据。
Genet Epidemiol. 2001 Jul;21(1):1-18. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1014.
7
The lifetime risks of breast cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.携带BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变的阿什肯纳兹犹太人群患乳腺癌的终生风险。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 May;10(5):467-73.
8
BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes.BRCAPRO验证、BRCA1/BRCA2基因检测的敏感性以及其他乳腺癌易感基因的患病率。
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jun 1;20(11):2701-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.05.121.
9
Population-based study of changing breast cancer risk in Icelandic BRCA2 mutation carriers, 1920-2000.1920 - 2000年冰岛BRCA2基因突变携带者乳腺癌风险变化的基于人群的研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Jan 18;98(2):116-22. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj012.
10
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and cancer family history of Danish women affected with multifocal or bilateral breast cancer at a young age.丹麦年轻女性多灶性或双侧乳腺癌患者的BRCA1和BRCA2突变状态及癌症家族史。
J Med Genet. 2001 Jun;38(6):361-8. doi: 10.1136/jmg.38.6.361.

引用本文的文献

1
A Prospective Comparison Study of Different Methods of Gathering Self-Reported Family History Information for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.一项关于收集自我报告家族病史信息以进行乳腺癌风险评估的不同方法的前瞻性比较研究。
J Genet Couns. 2003 Apr;12(2):151-70. doi: 10.1023/A:1022611307167.
2
Successful use of peer educators for sharing genetic information.
J Genet Couns. 2007 Aug;16(4):515-25. doi: 10.1007/s10897-007-9087-2. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
3
Information recovery in cancer families: value for risk estimations.癌症家族中的信息恢复:对风险评估的价值。
Fam Cancer. 2007;6(4):415-43. doi: 10.1007/s10689-007-9140-1. Epub 2007 May 23.
4
Genetic counselors: translating genomic science into clinical practice.遗传咨询师:将基因组科学转化为临床实践。
J Clin Invest. 2003 Nov;112(9):1274-9. doi: 10.1172/JCI20113.
5
Increased variation in mtDNA in patients with familial sensorineural hearing impairment.家族性感音神经性听力障碍患者线粒体DNA变异增加。
Hum Genet. 2003 Aug;113(3):220-7. doi: 10.1007/s00439-003-0966-9. Epub 2003 Jun 12.
6
Founder populations and their uses for breast cancer genetics.奠基人群及其在乳腺癌遗传学中的应用。
Breast Cancer Res. 2000;2(2):77-81. doi: 10.1186/bcr36. Epub 2000 Feb 7.